Comparison Overview

Positive Technologies

VS

Arrow Electronics

Positive Technologies

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://global.ptsecurity.com/en/?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=main&utm_content=bio&utm_term=global

Positive Technologies is a leading developer of products, solutions and services for result-driven cybersecurity that enable detection and prevention of attacks before they cause unacceptable damage to businesses and entire economic sectors. The company's technology portfolio covers most categories of information security tools and continues to expand. We create meta-products — a new generation of tools for achieving effective cybersecurity with minimal human involvement. For over 20 years, we've been creating and implementing technologies that demonstrate real results in cybersecurity and radically improve our clients' security levels.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 711
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Arrow Electronics

9201 East Dry Creek Road, Centennial, 80112, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
https://www.arrow.com/company

Arrow Electronics (NYSE:ARW) guides innovation forward for thousands of leading technology manufacturers and service providers. With 2024 sales of $27.9 billion, Arrow develops technology solutions that help improve business and daily life. Our broad portfolio that spans the entire technology landscape, helps customers design, distribute and deploy forward-thinking products that make the benefits of technology accessible to as many people as possible. Learn more at arrow.com. Are you thinking Five Years Out? Join us at careers.arrow.com.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 21,599
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/positivetechnologies.jpeg
Positive Technologies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arrow-electronics.jpeg
Arrow Electronics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Positive Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arrow Electronics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Positive Technologies in 2026.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arrow Electronics in 2026.

Incident History — Positive Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Positive Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arrow Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arrow Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/positivetechnologies.jpeg
Positive Technologies
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing emails
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arrow-electronics.jpeg
Arrow Electronics
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2010
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Arrow Electronics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Positive Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Positive Technologies and Arrow Electronics have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Arrow Electronics company and Positive Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arrow Electronics company nor Positive Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Arrow Electronics company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Positive Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Positive Technologies company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Arrow Electronics company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Positive Technologies company nor Arrow Electronics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Positive Technologies nor Arrow Electronics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Arrow Electronics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Positive Technologies company.

Arrow Electronics company employs more people globally than Positive Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Positive Technologies nor Arrow Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Positive Technologies nor Arrow Electronics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Positive Technologies nor Arrow Electronics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Positive Technologies nor Arrow Electronics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Positive Technologies nor Arrow Electronics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Positive Technologies nor Arrow Electronics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References