Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PortocaboPortocabo
VS
Qiddiya | القديةQiddiya | القدية
Portocabo

Portocabo

R. Arco, 13, 1o, A Coruña, 15003, ES

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.portocabo.com
762/1000Fair

Portocabo es una productora especializada en contenidos televisivos. El talento de nuevos creadores y profesionales que surgieron en Galicia en los últimos años, un excelente capital humano que significa experiencia, capacidad y frescura de ideas para pensar y hacer, es...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:58
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Qiddiya | القدية

Qiddiya | القدية

3889, Al Nakheel, Al Nakheel, Riyadh, 12382-6744 , SA

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://qiddiya.com
801/1000Good

Qiddiya Investment Company (QIC), a Public Investment Fund (PIF) company, is shaping one of the most transformative visions of Saudi Arabia’s future. By harnessing the Power of Play, we are unlocking new economic opportunities, elevating quality of life, and contributin...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:10,718
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Portocabo

Portocabo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Qiddiya | القدية

Qiddiya | القدية

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Portocabo in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Qiddiya | القدية in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Portocabo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Portocabo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Qiddiya | القدية (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Qiddiya | القدية cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Portocabo

Portocabo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Qiddiya | القدية

Qiddiya | القدية

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Portocabo company and Qiddiya | القدية company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Portocabo company and Qiddiya | القدية company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Portocabo company and Qiddiya | القدية company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Portocabo company and Qiddiya | القدية company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Portocabo company and Qiddiya | القدية company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Portocabo company and Qiddiya | القدية company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Portocabo company and Qiddiya | القدية company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Portocabo company and Qiddiya | القدية company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Portocabo company and Qiddiya | القدية company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Portocabo company and Qiddiya | القدية company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Portocabo company and Qiddiya | القدية company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Portocabo and Qiddiya | القدية, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Portocabo and Qiddiya | القدية, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Portocabo or Qiddiya | القدية ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Portocabo or Qiddiya | القدية ?
Between Portocabo and Qiddiya | القدية, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Portocabo and Qiddiya | القدية, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2