Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Porto di Trieste Servizi spaPorto di Trieste Servizi spa
VS
NTT DATA, Inc.NTT DATA, Inc.
Porto di Trieste Servizi spa

Porto di Trieste Servizi spa

Via K. Ludwig Von Bruck, 3, Trieste, 34144, IT

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
793/1000Fair

The company’s activities are focused on the enhancement of the port system by optimizing and organizing the needed services and by managing the material and immaterial properties. PTS’s innovation capabilities are strictly related to its mission to appear not only as...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
NTT DATA, Inc.

NTT DATA, Inc.

Tokyo, JP

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://services.global.ntt/
809/1000Good

NTT DATA, Inc. is a trusted global innovator of business and technology services. We're committed to helping clients innovate, optimize and transform for long-term success. Our R&D investments help organizations and society move confidently and sustainably into the digi...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:59,652
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Porto di Trieste Servizi spa

Porto di Trieste Servizi spa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NTT DATA, Inc.

NTT DATA, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porto di Trieste Servizi spa in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTT DATA, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Porto di Trieste Servizi spa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porto di Trieste Servizi spa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NTT DATA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTT DATA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Porto di Trieste Servizi spa

Porto di Trieste Servizi spa

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
POR230092125
NTT DATA, Inc.

NTT DATA, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa company and NTT DATA, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa and NTT DATA, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa and NTT DATA, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Porto di Trieste Servizi spa or NTT DATA, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Porto di Trieste Servizi spa or NTT DATA, Inc. ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa and NTT DATA, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Porto di Trieste Servizi spa and NTT DATA, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2