Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Portland Specialty BakingPortland Specialty Baking
VS
Lactalis GroupLactalis Group
Portland Specialty Baking

Portland Specialty Baking

3423 NE 172nd Pl, Portland, 97230, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.pdxbaking.com/
747/1000Moderate

Portland Specialty Baking is a premier wholesale manufacturer specializing in private-label bread products. With a commitment to quality and innovation, we partner with clients to deliver customized bakery solutions tailored to diverse markets.

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lactalis Group

Lactalis Group

10-20 Rue Adolphe Beck, LAVAL cedex 9, 53089, FR

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile

From family-owned company to dairy industry’s global leader Created in 1933 by André Besnier in Laval, Lactalis Group is a family-owned company settled in rural areas, which became dairy industry’s global leader and a major player of employment. True to its first trad...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:22,476
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Portland Specialty Baking

Portland Specialty Baking

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lactalis Group

Lactalis Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Portland Specialty Baking in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lactalis Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Portland Specialty Baking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Portland Specialty Baking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lactalis Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lactalis Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Portland Specialty Baking

Portland Specialty Baking

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lactalis Group

Lactalis Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Portland Specialty Baking company and Lactalis Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking company and Lactalis Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking company and Lactalis Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking company and Lactalis Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking company and Lactalis Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking company and Lactalis Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking company and Lactalis Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking company and Lactalis Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking company and Lactalis Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking company and Lactalis Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking company and Lactalis Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking and Lactalis Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking and Lactalis Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Portland Specialty Baking or Lactalis Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Portland Specialty Baking or Lactalis Group ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking and Lactalis Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Portland Specialty Baking and Lactalis Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA