Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Porsche Bank GroupPorsche Bank Group
VS
BlockBlock
Porsche Bank Group

Porsche Bank Group

Vogelweiderstraße 75, Salzburg, 5020, AT

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.porschebank.at/
755/1000Fair

Die Porsche Bank AG ist Teil der Porsche Holding und bietet als international tätiges Finanzdienstleistungs-Unternehmen für Kfz ein umfassendes Spektrum. Das Angebot reicht von Leasing über Kredit bis hin zu Versicherung und Wartung für die Konzernmarken VW, Audi, SEAT,...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:257
Subsidiaries:110
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Block

Block

Oakland, California, US

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://block.xyz/
749/1000Moderate

Block is one company built from many blocks, all united by the same purpose of economic empowerment. The blocks that form our foundational teams — People, Finance, Counsel, Hardware, Information Security, Platform Infrastructure Engineering, and more — provide support a...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:13,182
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Porsche Bank Group

Porsche Bank Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Block

Block

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porsche Bank Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Block in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Porsche Bank Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porsche Bank Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Block (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Block cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Porsche Bank Group

Porsche Bank Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Block

Block

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
JOI1902219091025

FAQ

Between Porsche Bank Group company and Block company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Porsche Bank Group company and Block company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Porsche Bank Group company and Block company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Porsche Bank Group company and Block company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Porsche Bank Group company and Block company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Porsche Bank Group company and Block company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Porsche Bank Group company and Block company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Porsche Bank Group company and Block company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Porsche Bank Group company and Block company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Porsche Bank Group company and Block company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Porsche Bank Group company and Block company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Porsche Bank Group and Block, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Porsche Bank Group and Block, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Porsche Bank Group or Block ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Porsche Bank Group or Block ?
Between Porsche Bank Group and Block, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Porsche Bank Group and Block, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3