Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Porsche Informatik GmbHPorsche Informatik GmbH
VS
Amazon Web Services (AWS)Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Porsche Informatik GmbH

Porsche Informatik GmbH

Louise-Piëch-Straße 9, Salzburg, 5020, AT

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Millions of users every day. 150 business services in 30 countries on four continents. More than 900 specialists shaping the digitalization of the automotive industry. That is Porsche Informatik. We combine decades of IT and automotive retail expertise with a holistic ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:646
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, 98019, US

Last Update: 19/07/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://aws.amazon.com
593/1000Very Poor

Launched in 2006, Amazon Web Services (AWS) began exposing key infrastructure services to businesses in the form of web services -- now widely known as cloud computing. The ultimate benefit of cloud computing, and AWS, is the ability to leverage a new business model and...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:148,035
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
21
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Porsche Informatik GmbH

Porsche Informatik GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porsche Informatik GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) has 1900.0% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Porsche Informatik GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porsche Informatik GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amazon Web Services (AWS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Porsche Informatik GmbH

Porsche Informatik GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMA1782541446
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HEAAMA1782153018
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIT1783694475

FAQ

Between Porsche Informatik GmbH company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Porsche Informatik GmbH or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Porsche Informatik GmbH or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Porsche Informatik GmbH and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8