Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Porsche Informatik FrancePorsche Informatik France
VS
IBMIBM
Porsche Informatik France

Porsche Informatik France

undefined, Paris, Paris Area, 95700, FR

Last Update: 25/03/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

Porsche Informatik, filiale de Porsche Holding, développe plusieurs solutions métier dont l'objectif est d'améliorer le parcours des clients dans leur usage de l'automobile, depuis les premiers contacts marketing jusqu'à l'entretien jusqu'au services après-vente et l'en...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:8
Subsidiaries:105
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IBM

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US

Last Update: 29/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.ibm.com
498/1000Critical

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and co...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:336,062
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
12
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Porsche Informatik France

Porsche Informatik France

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IBM

IBM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porsche Informatik France in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

IBM has 482.52% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Porsche Informatik France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porsche Informatik France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Porsche Informatik France

Porsche Informatik France

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IBM

IBM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1785357547
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBM1785321873
🔒 Incident : Breach
ATTIBM1781168591

FAQ

Between Porsche Informatik France company and IBM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Porsche Informatik France company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Porsche Informatik France company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Porsche Informatik France company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Porsche Informatik France company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Porsche Informatik France company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Porsche Informatik France company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Porsche Informatik France company and IBM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Porsche Informatik France company and IBM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Porsche Informatik France company and IBM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Porsche Informatik France company and IBM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Porsche Informatik France and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Porsche Informatik France and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Porsche Informatik France or IBM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Porsche Informatik France or IBM ?
Between Porsche Informatik France and IBM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Porsche Informatik France and IBM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA