Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Porsche Croatia d.o.o.Porsche Croatia d.o.o.
VS
Scania GroupScania Group
Porsche Croatia d.o.o.

Porsche Croatia d.o.o.

Miroslava Miholića 2, Zagreb, 10010, HR

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

Porsche Croatia d.o.o. is the general importer for the brands Volkswagen, Audi, SEAT, ŠKODA and CUPRA in Croatia, and is doing business under Europe's largest automotive retail company, Porsche Holding Salzburg. Together with its authorized dealers, Porsche Croatia prov...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:72
Subsidiaries:110
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Scania Group

Scania Group

Vagnmakarvägen 1, Södertälje, SE, SE-151 87

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.scania.com/
671/1000Weak

Scania is a world-leading provider of transport solutions committed to a better tomorrow. Our purpose is to drive the shift towards a sustainable transport system. In doing so, we are creating a world of mobility that’s better for business, society and our environment. ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:38,365
Subsidiaries:65
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Porsche Croatia d.o.o.

Porsche Croatia d.o.o.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Scania Group

Scania Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porsche Croatia d.o.o. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scania Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Porsche Croatia d.o.o. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porsche Croatia d.o.o. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Scania Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scania Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Porsche Croatia d.o.o.

Porsche Croatia d.o.o.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Scania Group

Scania Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NISSCATOYVOLKAWAVIJAG1775680268
🔒 Incident : Breach
SCA301061725

FAQ

Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. company and Scania Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. company and Scania Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. company and Scania Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. company and Scania Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. company and Scania Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. company and Scania Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. and Scania Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. and Scania Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Porsche Croatia d.o.o. or Scania Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Porsche Croatia d.o.o. or Scania Group ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. and Scania Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Porsche Croatia d.o.o. and Scania Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3