PLK
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
popeyes-louisiana-kitchen
Website:
Employees number:
24,533
Number of followers:
89,164
NAICS:
7225
Industry Type:
Homepage:
popeyes.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
POP_1311365
Scan Status:
In-progress
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen Company CyberSecurity Posture
popeyes.com
Founded in New Orleans in 1972, POPEYES® has more than 45 years of history and culinary tradition. Popeyes distinguishes itself with a unique New Orleans-style menu featuring spicy chicken, chicken tenders, fried shrimp, and other regional items. The chain's passion for its Louisiana heritage and flavorful authentic food has allowed Popeyes to become one of the world's largest chicken quick-service restaurants with over 3,600 restaurants in the U.S. and around the world.
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
PLK Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
PLK
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
PLK Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
PLK
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
PLK Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
2
Restaurant Brands International (RBI)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Ethical hackers BobDaHacker and BobTheShoplifter exposed severe security vulnerabilities within Restaurant Brands International (RBI), the parent company of Burger King, Tim Hortons, and Popeyes. The flaws included hard-coded passwords (e.g., 'admin') in HTML and drive-through systems, plain-text passwords sent via email, and an unrestricted API allowing unauthorized admin access. The hackers gained entry to employee accounts, internal configurations, raw audio recordings of drive-through conversations (containing customer personal data processed by AI), and even restaurant bathroom rating systems. The breaches revealed catastrophic oversight in cybersecurity fundamentals, with no basic safeguards like antivirus checks or system audits. While the ethical hackers responsibly disclosed the issues and confirmed no customer data was retained, the exposure demonstrated how easily malicious actors could have exploited these gaps. RBI reportedly fixed the vulnerabilities post-disclosure but did not publicly acknowledge the researchers, raising concerns about long-term security improvements. The incident underscores systemic negligence in protecting 30,000+ global outlets from potential data leaks, financial fraud, or operational disruptions.
Burger King
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Burger King, the world's largest fast food chain, exposed sensitive credentials to the public twice, endangering their systems and data. Burger King in France exposed private information to the public as a result of a website configuration error, the Cybernews investigation team found. People who applied for jobs at Burger King in France may have been impacted because the impacted website processed job applications. It's not the first time Burger King has exposed sensitive information; supposedly, the France branch exposed personally identifying information (PII) of children who purchased Burger King menus due to a similar misconfiguration.
Burger King
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: A French online shop Kool King specifically tailored to be used by kids who bought Burger King menus exposed nearly 37,900 records after a cyber attack. The data was leaked because the database storing it was misconfigured, allowing anyone with an Internet connection and the knowledge to find it to get to the records stored within. Since the database was not secured in any way and publicly accessible, anyone who reached it could then edit, download, or even destroy the data without needing admin credentials. The information compromised contained personally identifiable information (PII) such as emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, etc.100
PLK Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for PLK
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen in 2026.
Incident Types PLK vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen in 2026.
Incident History — PLK (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PLK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
PLK Company Subsidiaries
Founded in New Orleans in 1972, POPEYES® has more than 45 years of history and culinary tradition. Popeyes distinguishes itself with a unique New Orleans-style menu featuring spicy chicken, chicken tenders, fried shrimp, and other regional items. The chain's passion for its Louisiana heritage and flavorful authentic food has allowed Popeyes to become one of the world's largest chicken quick-service restaurants with over 3,600 restaurants in the U.S. and around the world.
Loading...
PLK Similar Companies
In-N-Out Burger
In-N-Out Burger was founded in 1948 by Harry and Esther Snyder in Baldwin Park, California, and remains privately owned and operated. Under the direction of the Snyder family, the company has opened restaurants throughout California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Texas, Oregon, Colorado, and Idaho. In-N-
ZAMP
Somos um grande ecossistema de restaurantes que reúne marcas internacionais como Burger King®, Popeyes®, Starbucks® e Subway®. E, por trás de cada receita de sucesso, estão os Zampers: gente que faz acontecer, que joga junto e que deixa sua marca todos os dias. Aqui, a gente acredita que o verdad
Sure, we’re The Wing Experts, but it’s our flavor that defines us. You taste it in our 12 signature sauces, you see it through our bold TV commercials, and you feel it when you walk through our doors. It’s what we like to call a flavor experience, and since the opening of our first restaurant in 199
Taco Bell
Taco Bell was born and raised in California and has been around since 1962. We went from selling everyone’s favorite Crunchy Tacos on the West Coast to a global brand with 8,200+ restaurants, 350 franchise organizations, that serve 42+ million fans each week around the globe. We’re not only the larg
Jack in the Box has always been the place for those who live outside the box. Where you can try new things and order what you want when you want it. Now, let’s get to the facts! Did you know Jack in the Box was founded on February 21, 1951, by a businessman named Robert O. Peterson in San Diego, Cal
KFC
We’re KFC. The iconic, brand making world-famous finger lickin’ good fried chicken since 1952. Our unrivaled people and culture are the true heart and soul of our brand. It’s where our people promise comes to life every day. Where our employees can be their best selves, make a difference, and have f
Subway is one of the world's largest quick service restaurant brands, serving freshly made-to-order sandwiches, wraps, salads and bowls to millions of guests, across over 100 countries in more than 37,000 restaurants every day. Subway restaurants are owned and operated by Subway franchisees – a ne
Wendy's was founded in 1969 by Dave Thomas in Columbus, Ohio. Dave built his business on the premise, “Quality Is Our Recipe®”, which remains the guidepost of the Wendy's system. Wendy's is best known for its made-to-order square hamburgers, using fresh, never frozen beef*, freshly-prepared salads,
Pizza Hut, a subsidiary of Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE: YUM), was founded in 1958 in Wichita, Kansas, and is a global leader in the pizza category with nearly 20,000 restaurants in more than 110 markets and territories. The brand has earned a reputation as a trailblazer in innovation with the creation o
.png)
PLK CyberSecurity News
September 09, 2025 07:00 AM
Popeyes, Tim Hortons, Burger King platforms have "catastrophic" vulnerabilities, say hackers
Researchers found a host of vulnerabilities in the platforms run by RBI to service Burger King, Tim Horton's, and Popeyes.
July 28, 2023 07:00 AM
Popeyes Says “I Do”: Chicken Franchise To Launch UK Wedding Catering Service
British couples can now opt for the same feast as Beyonce and Jay Z at their own wedding reception, as chicken brand Popeyes launches a new...
February 19, 2022 08:00 AM
Investing in poultry technology? Cybersecurity is key
Learn why cybersecurity plays a vital role in protecting poultry processing plants and production facilities against malicious data...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
PLK CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
The official website of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is http://www.popeyes.com.
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 787, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen operates primarily in the Restaurants industry.
Number of Employees at Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen employs approximately 24,533 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s LinkedIn Followers
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 89,164 followers.
NAICS Classification of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is classified under the NAICS code 7225, which corresponds to Restaurants and Other Eating Places.
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/popeyes-louisiana-kitchen.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
As of January 21, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen has an estimated 4,880 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach and Data Leak.
How does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes (after ethical hacker disclosure), and containment measures with patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly), and communication strategy with no public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Kool King Data Breach
Description: A French online shop Kool King specifically tailored to be used by kids who bought Burger King menus exposed nearly 37,900 records after a cyber attack. The data was leaked because the database storing it was misconfigured, allowing anyone with an Internet connection and the knowledge to find it to get to the records stored within. Since the database was not secured in any way and publicly accessible, anyone who reached it could then edit, download, or even destroy the data without needing admin credentials. The information compromised contained personally identifiable information (PII) such as emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, etc.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Database
Vulnerability Exploited: Publicly Accessible Database
Title: Burger King Data Exposure Incidents
Description: Burger King, the world's largest fast food chain, exposed sensitive credentials to the public twice, endangering their systems and data.
Type: Data Exposure
Attack Vector: Website Configuration Error
Vulnerability Exploited: Website Misconfiguration
Title: Hard-coded passwords exposed Burger King’s fragile security infrastructure worldwide
Description: Hackers accessed employee accounts and internal configurations with shocking ease due to weak security practices at Restaurant Brands International (RBI), the parent company of Burger King, Tim Hortons, and Popeyes. Ethical hackers BobDaHacker and BobTheShoplifter discovered hard-coded passwords (e.g., 'admin'), plain-text passwords sent via email, and unsecured APIs that allowed unrestricted access. The vulnerabilities exposed internal systems, employee accounts, drive-through audio recordings (containing customer PII), and even restaurant bathroom rating screens. The hackers described RBI’s security as 'catastrophic,' highlighting systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity fundamentals. RBI reportedly fixed the issues after disclosure but did not publicly acknowledge the ethical hackers.
Type: Unauthorized Access
Attack Vector: Hard-coded CredentialsPlain-text Passwords in EmailsUnrestricted API AccessDefault/Weak Passwords (e.g., 'admin')
Vulnerability Exploited: Hard-coded passwords in HTML/APIsLack of password encryptionMissing access controlsPoor credential management
Threat Actor: BobDaHacker (Ethical Hacker)BobTheShoplifter (Ethical Hacker)
Motivation: Ethical Hacking / Responsible Disclosure
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Data Leak.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Hard-coded password in HTMLDefault 'admin' password in drive-through tabletsUnrestricted API signup.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Data Compromised: Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher codes, Links to the externally stored certificates
Systems Affected: Database
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Children's pii
Systems Affected: Job Application WebsiteOnline Ordering System
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Data Compromised: Employee account credentials, Internal system configurations, Drive-through audio recordings (potential pii), Restaurant operational data (e.g., bathroom rating screens)
Systems Affected: Equipment ordering websiteDrive-through tablet systemsAI-powered customer/staff evaluation systemsRestaurant management APIsBathroom rating screens
Operational Impact: High (potential for unauthorized access to critical systems, customer data exposure, and operational disruption)
Brand Reputation Impact: High (public exposure of systemic security failures across global brands: Burger King, Tim Hortons, Popeyes)
Identity Theft Risk: Moderate (drive-through audio recordings may contain customer PII)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher Codes, Links To The Externally Stored Certificates, , Pii, Children'S Pii, , Employee Credentials, Internal Configurations, Audio Recordings (Potential Pii), Operational Data and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Entity Name: Kool King
Entity Type: Online Shop
Industry: Retail
Location: France
Customers Affected: 37900
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Entity Name: Burger King
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Fast Food
Location: France
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Restaurant Brands International (RBI)
Entity Type: Parent Company
Industry: Fast Food / Hospitality
Location: Global (30,000+ outlets)
Size: Large Enterprise
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Burger King
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Fast Food
Location: Global
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Tim Hortons
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Fast Food / Coffee
Location: Primarily Canada/US
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Popeyes
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Fast Food
Location: Global
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (after ethical hacker disclosure)
Containment Measures: Patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly)
Communication Strategy: No public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes (after ethical hacker disclosure).
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Type of Data Compromised: Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher codes, Links to the externally stored certificates
Number of Records Exposed: 37900
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: emailspasswordsnamesphonesDOB
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Type of Data Compromised: Pii, Children's pii
Personally Identifiable Information: Job ApplicantsChildren's PII
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Type of Data Compromised: Employee credentials, Internal configurations, Audio recordings (potential pii), Operational data
Sensitivity of Data: Moderate to High (includes PII in audio recordings and system access credentials)
Data Exfiltration: No (ethical hackers did not retain data)
Data Encryption: No (passwords stored in plain-text)
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (in drive-through audio recordings)
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly) and .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Lessons Learned: Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Recommendations: Implement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system access
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Source: Cybernews Investigation Team
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Source: Tom’s Hardware
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Source: Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Cybernews Investigation Team, and Source: Tom’s Hardware, and Source: Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Investigation Status: Completed (by ethical hackers; RBI applied fixes but no public report)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through No public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entry Point: Hard-Coded Password In Html, Default 'Admin' Password In Drive-Through Tablets, Unrestricted Api Signup,
High Value Targets: Employee Accounts, Internal Configurations, Drive-Through Audio Systems, Restaurant Management Apis,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Employee Accounts, Internal Configurations, Drive-Through Audio Systems, Restaurant Management Apis,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Root Causes: Misconfigured Database
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Root Causes: Lack Of Basic Cybersecurity Hygiene (E.G., Hard-Coded Passwords, Plain-Text Credentials), Absence Of Access Controls (E.G., Unrestricted Api Access), Inadequate System Audits And Vulnerability Assessments, Poor Credential Management Practices, Corporate Neglect Of Security Fundamentals Despite Global Scale,
Corrective Actions: Patches Applied To Reported Vulnerabilities (Per Rbi), No Public Confirmation Of Broader Security Overhaul Or Policy Changes,
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Patches Applied To Reported Vulnerabilities (Per Rbi), No Public Confirmation Of Broader Security Overhaul Or Policy Changes, .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an BobDaHacker (Ethical Hacker)BobTheShoplifter (Ethical Hacker).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, , Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Children's PII, , Employee account credentials, Internal system configurations, Drive-through audio recordings (potential PII), Restaurant operational data (e.g., bathroom rating screens) and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Job Application WebsiteOnline Ordering System and Equipment ordering websiteDrive-through tablet systemsAI-powered customer/staff evaluation systemsRestaurant management APIsBathroom rating screens.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Children's PII, emails, names, DOB, Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Drive-through audio recordings (potential PII), voucher codes, Employee account credentials, Internal system configurations, links to the externally stored certificates, phones, Restaurant operational data (e.g., bathroom rating screens) and passwords.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 379.0.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Implement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system access, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program and Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Cybernews Investigation Team, Tom’s Hardware and Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Completed (by ethical hackers; RBI applied fixes but no public report).
Initial Access Broker
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Misconfigured Database, Lack of basic cybersecurity hygiene (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials)Absence of access controls (e.g., unrestricted API access)Inadequate system audits and vulnerability assessmentsPoor credential management practicesCorporate neglect of security fundamentals despite global scale.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Patches applied to reported vulnerabilities (per RBI)No public confirmation of broader security overhaul or policy changes.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g., execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=popeyes-louisiana-kitchen' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
