PLK
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
popeyes-louisiana-kitchen
Website:
Employees number:
24,533
Number of followers:
89,164
NAICS:
7225
Industry Type:
Homepage:
popeyes.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
POP_1311365
Scan Status:
In-progress
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen Company CyberSecurity Posture
popeyes.com
Founded in New Orleans in 1972, POPEYES® has more than 45 years of history and culinary tradition. Popeyes distinguishes itself with a unique New Orleans-style menu featuring spicy chicken, chicken tenders, fried shrimp, and other regional items. The chain's passion for its Louisiana heritage and flavorful authentic food has allowed Popeyes to become one of the world's largest chicken quick-service restaurants with over 3,600 restaurants in the U.S. and around the world.
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
PLK Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
PLK
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
PLK Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
PLK
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
PLK Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
2
Burger King
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Burger King, the world's largest fast food chain, exposed sensitive credentials to the public twice, endangering their systems and data. Burger King in France exposed private information to the public as a result of a website configuration error, the Cybernews investigation team found. People who applied for jobs at Burger King in France may have been impacted because the impacted website processed job applications. It's not the first time Burger King has exposed sensitive information; supposedly, the France branch exposed personally identifying information (PII) of children who purchased Burger King menus due to a similar misconfiguration.
Burger King
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: A French online shop Kool King specifically tailored to be used by kids who bought Burger King menus exposed nearly 37,900 records after a cyber attack. The data was leaked because the database storing it was misconfigured, allowing anyone with an Internet connection and the knowledge to find it to get to the records stored within. Since the database was not secured in any way and publicly accessible, anyone who reached it could then edit, download, or even destroy the data without needing admin credentials. The information compromised contained personally identifiable information (PII) such as emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, etc.100
Restaurant Brands International (RBI)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Ethical hackers **BobDaHacker** and **BobTheShoplifter** exposed severe security vulnerabilities within **Restaurant Brands International (RBI)**, the parent company of Burger King, Tim Hortons, and Popeyes. The flaws included **hard-coded passwords** (e.g., 'admin') in HTML and drive-through systems, **plain-text passwords sent via email**, and an **unrestricted API** allowing unauthorized admin access. The hackers gained entry to **employee accounts, internal configurations, raw audio recordings of drive-through conversations** (containing customer personal data processed by AI), and even **restaurant bathroom rating systems**. The breaches revealed **catastrophic oversight** in cybersecurity fundamentals, with no basic safeguards like antivirus checks or system audits. While the ethical hackers responsibly disclosed the issues and confirmed **no customer data was retained**, the exposure demonstrated how easily malicious actors could have exploited these gaps. RBI reportedly fixed the vulnerabilities post-disclosure but did not publicly acknowledge the researchers, raising concerns about long-term security improvements. The incident underscores systemic negligence in protecting **30,000+ global outlets** from potential data leaks, financial fraud, or operational disruptions.
PLK Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for PLK
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen in 2025.
Incident Types PLK vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen in 2025.
Incident History — PLK (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PLK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
PLK Company Subsidiaries
Founded in New Orleans in 1972, POPEYES® has more than 45 years of history and culinary tradition. Popeyes distinguishes itself with a unique New Orleans-style menu featuring spicy chicken, chicken tenders, fried shrimp, and other regional items. The chain's passion for its Louisiana heritage and flavorful authentic food has allowed Popeyes to become one of the world's largest chicken quick-service restaurants with over 3,600 restaurants in the U.S. and around the world.
Loading...
PLK Similar Companies
Whataburger
On Aug. 8, 1950, an adventurous and determined entrepreneur named Harmon Dobson opened up the world’s first Whataburger on Ayers Street in Corpus Christi, Texas. He had a simple goal: to serve a burger so big it took two hands to hold and so good that after one bite customers would say, “What a burg
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers
Founded by Todd Graves in 1996 in Baton Rouge, La., RAISING CANE'S CHICKEN FINGERS has over 800 restaurants in 41 states, with many new restaurants under construction. The company has ONE LOVE®—craveable chicken finger meals—and is continually recognized for its unique business model and customer sa
With 58,000 employees and more than 700 restaurants in the United States and Canada, and a growing international presence, Red Lobster is the world’s largest seafood restaurant company. Our vision is to be where the world goes for seafood now and for generations. Red Lobster is an innovative, v
Domino's
Domino’s is a purpose-inspired, performance-driven company powered by exceptional people who are committed to feeding the power of possible—one pizza at a time. Founded in 1960 with a single store in Ypsilanti, Michigan, Domino’s has grown into one of the most recognized and leading pizza brands in
Culver's Restaurants
With strong, Midwestern family values and genuine hometown hospitality, Culver’s® has proudly served its signature ButterBurgers® and Fresh Frozen Custard since we opened our first restaurant in 1984. There are now over 1,000 Culver’s restaurants in 26 states, with more than 50,000 team members offe
KFC
We’re KFC. The iconic, brand making world-famous finger lickin’ good fried chicken since 1952. Our unrivaled people and culture are the true heart and soul of our brand. It’s where our people promise comes to life every day. Where our employees can be their best selves, make a difference, and have f
Pizza Hut, a subsidiary of Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE: YUM), was founded in 1958 in Wichita, Kansas, and since then has earned a reputation as a trailblazer in innovation with the creation of icons like Original® Pan and Original® Stuffed Crust pizzas. In 1994, Pizza Hut pizza was the very first online
Chili's
Chili's opened as a fun Dallas burger joint with a loyalty to happy hour and blue jeans. We prided ourselves on our humble beginnings, following a devotion to great food, warm hospitality and community spirit. Today, with restaurants all over the world, we continue to cook up the best in casual fare
Wendy's was founded in 1969 by Dave Thomas in Columbus, Ohio. Dave built his business on the premise, “Quality Is Our Recipe®”, which remains the guidepost of the Wendy's system. Wendy's is best known for its made-to-order square hamburgers, using fresh, never frozen beef*, freshly-prepared salads,
.png)
PLK CyberSecurity News
September 09, 2025 07:00 AM
Popeyes, Tim Hortons, Burger King platforms have "catastrophic" vulnerabilities, say hackers
Researchers found a host of vulnerabilities in the platforms run by RBI to service Burger King, Tim Horton's, and Popeyes.
March 15, 2024 07:00 AM
Revealed: Why McDonald’s Closed Some Locations Early This Morning
McDonald's says a global systems outage affected several stores early on March 15. The company has worked to bring its locations back...
February 19, 2022 08:00 AM
Investing in poultry technology? Cybersecurity is key
Learn why cybersecurity plays a vital role in protecting poultry processing plants and production facilities against malicious data...
April 09, 2019 07:00 AM
Brunch with Peter Thiel turned into a pitch meeting for CEO Tim Junio
Brunch with Peter Thiel turned into an impromptu pitch meeting for this former CIA analyst and current cybersecurity CEO Tim Junio.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
PLK CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
The official website of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is http://www.popeyes.com.
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 787, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen operates primarily in the Restaurants industry.
Number of Employees at Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen employs approximately 24,533 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s LinkedIn Followers
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 89,164 followers.
NAICS Classification of Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is classified under the NAICS code 7225, which corresponds to Restaurants and Other Eating Places.
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/popeyes-louisiana-kitchen.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen has an estimated 4,808 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach and Data Leak.
How does Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an incident response plan activated with yes (after ethical hacker disclosure), and containment measures with patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly), and communication strategy with no public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Kool King Data Breach
Description: A French online shop Kool King specifically tailored to be used by kids who bought Burger King menus exposed nearly 37,900 records after a cyber attack. The data was leaked because the database storing it was misconfigured, allowing anyone with an Internet connection and the knowledge to find it to get to the records stored within. Since the database was not secured in any way and publicly accessible, anyone who reached it could then edit, download, or even destroy the data without needing admin credentials. The information compromised contained personally identifiable information (PII) such as emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, etc.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Database
Vulnerability Exploited: Publicly Accessible Database
Title: Burger King Data Exposure Incidents
Description: Burger King, the world's largest fast food chain, exposed sensitive credentials to the public twice, endangering their systems and data.
Type: Data Exposure
Attack Vector: Website Configuration Error
Vulnerability Exploited: Website Misconfiguration
Title: Hard-coded passwords exposed Burger King’s fragile security infrastructure worldwide
Description: Hackers accessed employee accounts and internal configurations with shocking ease due to weak security practices at Restaurant Brands International (RBI), the parent company of Burger King, Tim Hortons, and Popeyes. Ethical hackers BobDaHacker and BobTheShoplifter discovered hard-coded passwords (e.g., 'admin'), plain-text passwords sent via email, and unsecured APIs that allowed unrestricted access. The vulnerabilities exposed internal systems, employee accounts, drive-through audio recordings (containing customer PII), and even restaurant bathroom rating screens. The hackers described RBI’s security as 'catastrophic,' highlighting systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity fundamentals. RBI reportedly fixed the issues after disclosure but did not publicly acknowledge the ethical hackers.
Type: Unauthorized Access
Attack Vector: Hard-coded CredentialsPlain-text Passwords in EmailsUnrestricted API AccessDefault/Weak Passwords (e.g., 'admin')
Vulnerability Exploited: Hard-coded passwords in HTML/APIsLack of password encryptionMissing access controlsPoor credential management
Threat Actor: BobDaHacker (Ethical Hacker)BobTheShoplifter (Ethical Hacker)
Motivation: Ethical Hacking / Responsible Disclosure
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Data Leak.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Hard-coded password in HTMLDefault 'admin' password in drive-through tabletsUnrestricted API signup.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Data Compromised: Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher codes, Links to the externally stored certificates
Systems Affected: Database
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Children's pii
Systems Affected: Job Application WebsiteOnline Ordering System
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Data Compromised: Employee account credentials, Internal system configurations, Drive-through audio recordings (potential pii), Restaurant operational data (e.g., bathroom rating screens)
Systems Affected: Equipment ordering websiteDrive-through tablet systemsAI-powered customer/staff evaluation systemsRestaurant management APIsBathroom rating screens
Operational Impact: High (potential for unauthorized access to critical systems, customer data exposure, and operational disruption)
Brand Reputation Impact: High (public exposure of systemic security failures across global brands: Burger King, Tim Hortons, Popeyes)
Identity Theft Risk: Moderate (drive-through audio recordings may contain customer PII)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher Codes, Links To The Externally Stored Certificates, , Pii, Children'S Pii, , Employee Credentials, Internal Configurations, Audio Recordings (Potential Pii), Operational Data and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Entity Name: Kool King
Entity Type: Online Shop
Industry: Retail
Location: France
Customers Affected: 37900
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Entity Name: Burger King
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Fast Food
Location: France
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Restaurant Brands International (RBI)
Entity Type: Parent Company
Industry: Fast Food / Hospitality
Location: Global (30,000+ outlets)
Size: Large Enterprise
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Burger King
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Fast Food
Location: Global
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Tim Hortons
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Fast Food / Coffee
Location: Primarily Canada/US
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entity Name: Popeyes
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Fast Food
Location: Global
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (after ethical hacker disclosure)
Containment Measures: Patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly)
Communication Strategy: No public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes (after ethical hacker disclosure).
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Type of Data Compromised: Emails, Passwords, Names, Phones, Dob, Voucher codes, Links to the externally stored certificates
Number of Records Exposed: 37900
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: emailspasswordsnamesphonesDOB
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Type of Data Compromised: Pii, Children's pii
Personally Identifiable Information: Job ApplicantsChildren's PII
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Type of Data Compromised: Employee credentials, Internal configurations, Audio recordings (potential pii), Operational data
Sensitivity of Data: Moderate to High (includes PII in audio recordings and system access credentials)
Data Exfiltration: No (ethical hackers did not retain data)
Data Encryption: No (passwords stored in plain-text)
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (in drive-through audio recordings)
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly) and .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Lessons Learned: Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Recommendations: Implement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system accessImplement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program, Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks, Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system access
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Exposure BUR22818923
Source: Cybernews Investigation Team
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Source: Tom’s Hardware
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Source: Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Cybernews Investigation Team, and Source: Tom’s Hardware, and Source: Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Investigation Status: Completed (by ethical hackers; RBI applied fixes but no public report)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through No public acknowledgment of ethical hackers or incident details.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Entry Point: Hard-Coded Password In Html, Default 'Admin' Password In Drive-Through Tablets, Unrestricted Api Signup,
High Value Targets: Employee Accounts, Internal Configurations, Drive-Through Audio Systems, Restaurant Management Apis,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Employee Accounts, Internal Configurations, Drive-Through Audio Systems, Restaurant Management Apis,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BUR22620323
Root Causes: Misconfigured Database
Incident : Unauthorized Access RES1202112091125
Root Causes: Lack Of Basic Cybersecurity Hygiene (E.G., Hard-Coded Passwords, Plain-Text Credentials), Absence Of Access Controls (E.G., Unrestricted Api Access), Inadequate System Audits And Vulnerability Assessments, Poor Credential Management Practices, Corporate Neglect Of Security Fundamentals Despite Global Scale,
Corrective Actions: Patches Applied To Reported Vulnerabilities (Per Rbi), No Public Confirmation Of Broader Security Overhaul Or Policy Changes,
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Patches Applied To Reported Vulnerabilities (Per Rbi), No Public Confirmation Of Broader Security Overhaul Or Policy Changes, .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an BobDaHacker (Ethical Hacker)BobTheShoplifter (Ethical Hacker).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were emails, passwords, names, phones, DOB, voucher codes, links to the externally stored certificates, , Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Children's PII, , Employee account credentials, Internal system configurations, Drive-through audio recordings (potential PII), Restaurant operational data (e.g., bathroom rating screens) and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Job Application WebsiteOnline Ordering System and Equipment ordering websiteDrive-through tablet systemsAI-powered customer/staff evaluation systemsRestaurant management APIsBathroom rating screens.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Patch applied to vulnerabilities (reportedly).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were passwords, Employee account credentials, Drive-through audio recordings (potential PII), emails, Personally Identifiable Information (PII), phones, links to the externally stored certificates, Children's PII, names, voucher codes, Internal system configurations, DOB, Restaurant operational data (e.g. and bathroom rating screens).
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 379.0.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Systemic neglect of basic cybersecurity practices (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials, unrestricted APIs) can expose global enterprises to severe risks. Ethical hacking revealed critical gaps in access controls, credential management, and operational security across RBI’s brands.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing, Implement robust password policies and multi-factor authentication (MFA), Monitor dark web for exposed credentials or system access, Eliminate hard-coded credentials and enforce encryption for sensitive data, Restrict API access with proper authentication/authorization, Establish a transparent vulnerability disclosure program and Train employees on secure credential handling and phishing risks.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Cybernews Investigation Team, Ethical Hackers’ Blog (Archived) and Tom’s Hardware.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Completed (by ethical hackers; RBI applied fixes but no public report).
Initial Access Broker
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Misconfigured Database, Lack of basic cybersecurity hygiene (e.g., hard-coded passwords, plain-text credentials)Absence of access controls (e.g., unrestricted API access)Inadequate system audits and vulnerability assessmentsPoor credential management practicesCorporate neglect of security fundamentals despite global scale.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Patches applied to reported vulnerabilities (per RBI)No public confirmation of broader security overhaul or policy changes.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=popeyes-louisiana-kitchen' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
