Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PonPon
VS
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbHDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Pon

Pon

Stadionplein 28, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, 1076, NL

Last Update: 12/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pon.com
764/1000Fair

Volkswagen, Swapfiets, Audi, Gazelle, Caterpillar en Greenwheels. Inderdaad, bekende merken. Maar wist je ook dat ze bij Pon horen? Pon is een van Nederlands grootste familiebedrijven en een internationale handels- en serviceorganisatie op het gebied van mobiliteit. Wer...

NAICS:522293
NAICS Definition:International Trade Financing
Employees:3,713
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 32+36, Bonn, 53113, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.giz.de
797/1000Fair

As a service provider in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development and international education work, we are dedicated to shaping a future worth living around the world. GIZ has over 50 years of experience in a wide variety of areas, including ec...

NAICS:522293
NAICS Definition:International Trade Financing
Employees:26,092
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pon

Pon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pon in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pon

Pon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pon company and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pon company and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pon company and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pon company and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pon company and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pon company and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pon company and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pon company and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pon company and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pon company and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pon company and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pon and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pon and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pon or Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pon or Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH ?
Between Pon and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pon and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8