Comparison Overview
Pon

Pon
Stadionplein 28, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, 1076, NL
Last Update: 12/11/2025
Volkswagen, Swapfiets, Audi, Gazelle, Caterpillar en Greenwheels. Inderdaad, bekende merken. Maar wist je ook dat ze bij Pon horen? Pon is een van Nederlands grootste familiebedrijven en een internationale handels- en serviceorganisatie op het gebied van mobiliteit. Wer...

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 32+36, Bonn, 53113, DE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
As a service provider in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development and international education work, we are dedicated to shaping a future worth living around the world. GIZ has over 50 years of experience in a wide variety of areas, including ec...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Pon







Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Pon in 2026.
Incidents vs International Trade and Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH in 2026.
Incident History - Pon (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Pon

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.