Comparison Overview
Pon Automotive
Pon Automotive
Zuiderinslag 2, Leusden, 3833 BP, NL
Last Update: 19/03/2026
Pon Automotive richt zich op de import, de logistieke afhandeling, marketing, distributie, service en onderhoud van auto’s, bedrijfsauto’s en banden. Aanvullend, maar niet minder belangrijk, zijn de diensten die bij deze producten horen zoals onderhoud, reparatie, verhu...
General Motors
100 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan, US, 48243
Last Update: 26/06/2026
General Motors’ vision is to create a world with Zero Crashes, Zero Emissions and Zero Congestion, and we have committed ourselves to leading the way toward this future. Today, we are in the midst of a transportation revolution, and we have the ambition, the talent and ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Pon Automotive
General Motors
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Pon Automotive in 2026.
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
General Motors has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Pon Automotive (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pon Automotive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - General Motors (X = Date, Y = Severity)
General Motors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Pon Automotive
General Motors
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Spinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform. Prior to versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4 on their respective release lines, Kustomize bake operations allow unsafe YAML tag processing in rosco manifests. This can lead to remote code execution on rosco pods when performing Kustomize bakes. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4.
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/2d75818b85cc4c35144d5e5ed45e7340fcab5dfe
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/bbc30c9b9034a056e95f012fa1b34e9fd703cae7
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/de5a7a05af35aee19eb71d289cd0b77f67509009
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/df32d568e82519d9f3896fc9007baba0077c87fd
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/f5cec213f8cf207843ed5a6929395960a1ca094f
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2025.3.4
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2025.4.4
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.0.3
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.1.1
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.2.0
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/security/advisories/GHSA-p68j-q7hf-3qcp
Multiple connections to the backend using the same charging station ID are allowed, which could allow an attacker to deploy multiple instances of malicious OCPP clients to overwhelm the backend.
Previously, there was no throttling on repeated authentication attempts to the charging station backend, which could allow an attacker to execute a denial-of-service attack.
The charging station websocket endpoint accepts connections without proper authentication, which could lead to privilege escalation.
vulnerability in Drupal Commerce guest registration allows . This issue affects Commerce guest registration versions: *.*.