Comparison Overview
Politecnico di Milano
Politecnico di Milano
Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, Milano, IT
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Politecnico Milano is a scientific-technological university which trains engineers, architects and designers. The University has always focused on the quality and innovation of its teaching and research, developing a fruitful relationship with business and productive w...
Technical University of Munich
Arcisstraße 21, München, Munich, Bavaria, DE, 80333
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Our university combines top-class facilities for cutting-edge research with unique learning opportunities for 52,000 students. Whether our researchers are investigating the origins of life, matter and the universe or looking for solutions to the major challenges for our...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Politecnico di Milano
Technical University of Munich
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Politecnico di Milano in 2026.
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Technical University of Munich in 2026.
Incident History - Politecnico di Milano (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Politecnico di Milano cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Technical University of Munich (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Technical University of Munich cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Politecnico di Milano
Technical University of Munich
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.