Policy@Manchester
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
policy-at-manchester
Employees number:
5
Number of followers:
6,072
NAICS:
921
Industry Type:
Homepage:
ac.uk
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
POL_1944031
Scan Status:
In-progress
Policy@Manchester Company CyberSecurity Posture
ac.uk
The University of Manchester's policy engagement unit, Policy@Manchester connects researchers with policymakers and influencers, nurtures long-term policy engagement relationships, and seeks to enhance stakeholder understanding of pressing policy challenges. We aim to impact lives globally, nationally and locally through influencing and challenging policymakers with robust research-informed evidence and ideas. The opinions and views expressed are those of the respective content contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The University of Manchester. Policy recommendations are based on authors’ research evidence and experience in their fields.
Policy@Manchester A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Policy@Manchester Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
Policy@Manchester
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Policy@Manchester Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Policy@Manchester
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Policy@Manchester Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
The University of Manchester
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: One of the major educational institutions in the UK, the University of Manchester, was the victim of a cyberattack. The renowned university believes that the threat actors have taken data from its systems. The Information Commissioner's Office, the National Cyber Security Center (NCSC), the National Crime Agency, and other regulatory organizations were among the local authorities that the institute already informed. The business reported that an unauthorized entity had probably copied data after accessing several of their systems. For clients' information, the University has also created a FAQ website concerning the ongoing investigation. The institution emphasized that there is no evidence to imply that customers' private bank information has been accessed.
The University of Manchester
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Cyberattackers probably took staff and student data from the University of Manchester's computers. The University became aware of a security compromise and immediately began an inquiry. The Information Commissioner's Office, the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), the National Crime Agency, and other regulatory organizations were among the local authorities that the institute already informed. The organization emphasized that there is no evidence that customers' private bank information has been accessed.
Policy@Manchester Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Policy@Manchester
Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Policy@Manchester in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Policy@Manchester in 2025.
Incident Types Policy@Manchester vs Public Policy Offices Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Policy@Manchester in 2025.
Incident History — Policy@Manchester (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Policy@Manchester cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Policy@Manchester Company Subsidiaries
The University of Manchester's policy engagement unit, Policy@Manchester connects researchers with policymakers and influencers, nurtures long-term policy engagement relationships, and seeks to enhance stakeholder understanding of pressing policy challenges. We aim to impact lives globally, nationally and locally through influencing and challenging policymakers with robust research-informed evidence and ideas. The opinions and views expressed are those of the respective content contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The University of Manchester. Policy recommendations are based on authors’ research evidence and experience in their fields.
Loading...
Policy@Manchester Similar Companies
University of Houston
Founded in 1927, the University of Houston is the leading public research university in the vibrant international city of Houston. Each year, we educate more than 47,000 students in more than 250 undergraduate and graduate academic programs, on campus and online. UH awards over 10,000 degrees annual
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Known for its innovative and interdisciplinary approach to education at both the graduate and undergraduate levels, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, a part of the University of Alabama System, is an internationally renowned research university and academic medical center with over $700 milli
Postgrados Universidad Mayor
Nuestra Misión es formar profesionales de excelencia a través de un modelo educativo basado en una visión integradora de los procesos formativos, que promueve el saber y el saber aplicado, con un enfoque preferentemente profesionalizante. Nuestros programas son pertinentes a las necesidades de co
University of Iowa
From the health sciences to the arts, our aim is to provide a diverse and technologically advanced community where all can work together to achieve excellence. On our beautiful campus spanning the Iowa River, our faculty and staff enjoy access to an array of cultural, educational, and recreational a
Purdue University
Purdue University is a vast laboratory for discovery. The university is known not only for science, technology, engineering, and math programs, but also for our imagination, ingenuity, and innovation. It’s a place where those who seek an education come to make their ideas real — especially when thos
Florida International University
FIU is Miami's public research university. Offering bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees, both on campus and fully online. Designated a Preeminent State Research University, FIU emphasizes research as a major component in the university's mission. For more than 50 years, FIU has positioned
.png)
Policy@Manchester CyberSecurity News
November 25, 2025 04:46 PM
Manchester to change data policy after data erased from issued phone
Manchester is implementing changes to its network and updating log-in credentials due in part to the wiping of data from a former employee's...
November 03, 2025 08:00 AM
Data centres: planning policy, sustainability, and resilience
This briefing provides an overview of data centres, including their economic impact, energy consumption, and water consumption.
September 26, 2025 07:00 AM
Manchester Tech Festival 25 | Cyber Security
Following the Core Conference, MTF dives deeper with a series of Track Days — specialised one-day events designed to explore the most...
September 24, 2025 07:00 AM
Military vet-founded Manchester cyber security firm establishes Southern base as it targets double revenue
A Manchester cyber security company founded by a pair of British military veterans is opening a Southern hub in Luton as it celebrates a...
May 07, 2025 07:00 AM
UK Cyber Security Chief Names China as Dominant Hacking Threat
The UK has named China as the dominant threat to national cybersecurity after a series of hacks and breaches involving British government departments and...
February 25, 2025 08:00 AM
GM Fellowship Scheme doubles in size as second year begins
Policy@Manchester has welcomed ten exceptional entrants to this year's Greater Manchester (GM) Policy Fellowship Scheme following the...
January 09, 2025 08:00 AM
Manchester City: What to know about the hearing and charges
Manchester City are expected to find out the verdict following their alleged violations of the Premier League's financial regulations after a...
November 21, 2024 08:00 AM
University awarded major funding for cyber security and nuclear robotics projects to drive UK regional growth
The University of Manchester will partner two new projects which have the capacity to transform science and technology.
October 24, 2024 07:00 AM
The University of Manchester avoided disaster in last year’s cyber attack – now it wants to set an industry example
When PJ Hemmaway joined the University of Manchester as CIO in 2022, the organization began an overhaul of its IT and cybersecurity...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Policy@Manchester CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Policy@Manchester
The official website of Policy@Manchester is http://www.policy.manchester.ac.uk.
Policy@Manchester’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Policy@Manchester’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 742, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Policy@Manchester’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Policy@Manchester currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Policy@Manchester have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Policy@Manchester is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Policy@Manchester have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Policy@Manchester does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Policy@Manchester comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Policy@Manchester is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Policy@Manchester have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Policy@Manchester does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Policy@Manchester comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Policy@Manchester is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Policy@Manchester have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Policy@Manchester is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Policy@Manchester
Policy@Manchester operates primarily in the Public Policy Offices industry.
Number of Employees at Policy@Manchester
Policy@Manchester employs approximately 5 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Policy@Manchester
Policy@Manchester presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Policy@Manchester’s LinkedIn Followers
Policy@Manchester’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 6,072 followers.
NAICS Classification of Policy@Manchester
Policy@Manchester is classified under the NAICS code 921, which corresponds to Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support.
Policy@Manchester’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Policy@Manchester does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Policy@Manchester’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Policy@Manchester maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/policy-at-manchester.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Policy@Manchester
As of November 28, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Policy@Manchester has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Policy@Manchester has an estimated 1,023 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Policy@Manchester ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak.
How does Policy@Manchester detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with information commissioner's office, third party assistance with national cyber security center (ncsc), third party assistance with national crime agency, and and communication strategy with faq website for clients, and law enforcement notified with information commissioner's office, law enforcement notified with national cyber security centre (ncsc), law enforcement notified with national crime agency..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Cyberattack on the University of Manchester
Description: One of the major educational institutions in the UK, the University of Manchester, was the victim of a cyberattack. The renowned university believes that the threat actors have taken data from its systems. The Information Commissioner's Office, the National Cyber Security Center (NCSC), the National Crime Agency, and other regulatory organizations were among the local authorities that the institute already informed. The business reported that an unauthorized entity had probably copied data after accessing several of their systems. For clients' information, the University has also created a FAQ website concerning the ongoing investigation. The institution emphasized that there is no evidence to imply that customers' private bank information has been accessed.
Type: Data Breach
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Data Leak.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach THE23011623
Data Compromised: Personal information
Incident : Data Breach THE74019923
Data Compromised: Staff data, Student data
Payment Information Risk: No evidence that customers' private bank information has been accessed.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Information, , Staff Data, Student Data and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach THE23011623
Entity Name: University of Manchester
Entity Type: Educational Institution
Industry: Education
Location: UK
Incident : Data Breach THE74019923
Entity Name: University of Manchester
Entity Type: Educational Institution
Industry: Education
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach THE23011623
Third Party Assistance: Information Commissioner'S Office, National Cyber Security Center (Ncsc), National Crime Agency.
Communication Strategy: FAQ website for clients
Incident : Data Breach THE74019923
Law Enforcement Notified: Information Commissioner's Office, National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), National Crime Agency,
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Information Commissioner's Office, National Cyber Security Center (NCSC), National Crime Agency, .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach THE23011623
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information
Incident : Data Breach THE74019923
Type of Data Compromised: Staff data, Student data
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach THE23011623
Regulatory Notifications: Information Commissioner's OfficeNational Cyber Security Center (NCSC)National Crime Agency
Incident : Data Breach THE74019923
Regulatory Notifications: Information Commissioner's OfficeNational Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)National Crime Agency
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach THE23011623
Investigation Status: Ongoing
Incident : Data Breach THE74019923
Investigation Status: Ongoing
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Faq Website For Clients.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach THE23011623
Customer Advisories: FAQ website for clients
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Faq Website For Clients and .
Post-Incident Analysis
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Information Commissioner'S Office, National Cyber Security Center (Ncsc), National Crime Agency, .
Additional Questions
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal Information, , staff data, student data and .
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was information commissioner's office, national cyber security center (ncsc), national crime agency, .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were staff data, student data and Personal Information.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an FAQ website for clients.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=policy-at-manchester' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
