Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG)Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG)
VS
BelastingdienstBelastingdienst
Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG)

Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG)

Rodovia Papa Joao Paulo II, Belo Horizonte, 31630900, BR

Last Update: 02/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.pc.mg.gov.br/
695/1000Weak

Apuração de crimes e contravenções, por meio da investigação criminal cientificamente aplicada, e o exercício da polícia judiciária para conhecimento de autoria, materialidade, motivo e circunstância, bem como a identificação civil e criminal, objetivando a segurança pú...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:2,053
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Belastingdienst

Belastingdienst

Korte Voorhout 7, Den Haag, NL, 2500 EE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

De organisatie bestaat uit diverse onderdelen, waaronder de Belastingdienst, Douane, Toeslagen, FIOD en enkele facilitaire organisaties. Met ruim 30.000 medewerkers werken we in kantoren die verspreid zijn over het hele land. Gezamenlijk heffen, innen en controleren we ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,978
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG)

Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Belastingdienst

Belastingdienst

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) has 31.51% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Belastingdienst in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Belastingdienst (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Belastingdienst cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG)

Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
POLOFF1780411166
Belastingdienst

Belastingdienst

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) company and Belastingdienst company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) company and Belastingdienst company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) company and Belastingdienst company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) company and Belastingdienst company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) company and Belastingdienst company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) company and Belastingdienst company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) and Belastingdienst, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) and Belastingdienst, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) or Belastingdienst ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) or Belastingdienst ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) and Belastingdienst, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Polícia Civil de Minas Gerais (PCMG) and Belastingdienst, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-26422
SUMMARY

clash-verge-service-ipc before 2.3.0 has a world-reachable IPC endpoint, leading to local privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-11441
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This vulnerability affects the function canAccessIssue of the file /issues/ of the component Pull Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument issue leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to resolve this issue. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11440
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This affects an unknown part of the file /repositories/{projectId}/default-branch of the component REST API. This manipulation of the argument project.defaultBranch causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to mitigate this issue. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11439
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /projects/ of the component Parent Project Handler. The manipulation of the argument project.parentId results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 can resolve this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11438
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /projects. The manipulation of the argument project.forkedFromId leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 addresses this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8