Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Pokémon Company InternationalThe Pokémon Company International
VS
TKOTKO
The Pokémon Company International

The Pokémon Company International

10770 NE 8th St, Suite 1500, Bellevue, Washington, US, 98004

Last Update: 18/08/2026

View Profile
719/1000Moderate

Join one of the most popular children’s entertainment properties in the world! The Pokémon Company International manages the Pokémon property outside of Asia and is responsible for brand management, licensing and marketing, the Pokémon Trading Card Game, the animated TV...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:2,194
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
TKO

TKO

N/A

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://tkogrp.com/
816/1000Good

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: TKO) is a premium sports and entertainment company. TKO owns iconic properties including UFC, the world’s premier mixed martial arts organization; WWE, the global leader in sports entertainment; and PBR, the world’s premier bull riding or...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:11,755
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Pokémon Company International

The Pokémon Company International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TKO

TKO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

The Pokémon Company International has 47.09% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TKO in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Pokémon Company International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Pokémon Company International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TKO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TKO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Pokémon Company International

The Pokémon Company International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CEVPOK1787070452
TKO

TKO

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The Pokémon Company International company and TKO company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Pokémon Company International company and TKO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Pokémon Company International company and TKO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Pokémon Company International company and TKO company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Pokémon Company International company and TKO company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Pokémon Company International company and TKO company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Pokémon Company International company and TKO company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Pokémon Company International company and TKO company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Pokémon Company International company and TKO company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Pokémon Company International company and TKO company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Pokémon Company International company and TKO company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Pokémon Company International and TKO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Pokémon Company International and TKO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Pokémon Company International or TKO ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Pokémon Company International or TKO ?
Between The Pokémon Company International and TKO, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Pokémon Company International and TKO, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA