Comparison Overview
Plug and Play Energy

Plug and Play Energy
440 N Wolfe Rd, Sunnyvale, 94085, US
Last Update: 24/03/2026
Plug and Play Energy is tackling the innovation challenge in the industry that powers the world. As the ultimate innovation platform, our Energy accelerator program, which is headquartered in Silicon Valley, is designed to bring innovation to the sector. Our focus are...

Virgin
Whitfield Studios, London, W1T2NS, GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
At Virgin, we’re all about creating unique customer experiences, challenging the status quo and championing people and the planet. For five decades, in five business sectors and on five continents, our purpose is to change business for good. The home of Virgin is Vir...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Plug and Play Energy







Virgin






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Venture Capital and Private Equity Principals Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Plug and Play Energy in 2026.
Incidents vs Venture Capital and Private Equity Principals Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Virgin in 2026.
Incident History - Plug and Play Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Plug and Play Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Virgin (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Virgin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Plug and Play Energy

Virgin
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to properly clean up decode-side metadata for rejected inference requests in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Remote attackers can submit requests with max_tokens=0 to exhaust decode-worker memory without bound until the worker restarts.
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/v0.29.0/vllm/distributed/kv_transfer/kv_connector/v1/nixl/push_worker.py#L162-L181
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/55677
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vllm-through-0.29.0-memory-exhaustion-via-rejected-requests
redis-parser through 3.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the RESP protocol parser that allows malicious Redis endpoints to crash the client process through unbounded recursion on nested arrays. Attackers can send crafted RESP byte streams with repeated array headers that exhaust the V8 call stack, causing an uncaught RangeError that terminates the Node.js process without triggering error handling callbacks.
- https://github.com/NodeRedis/node-redis-parser
- https://github.com/NodeRedis/node-redis-parser/blob/701655430f5f7d9ca00892a02f7eefcbc1193a98/lib/parser.js#L204-L213
- https://github.com/NodeRedis/node-redis-parser/blob/701655430f5f7d9ca00892a02f7eefcbc1193a98/lib/parser.js#L291-L306
- https://github.com/redis/ioredis/issues/2108
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/redis-parser-through-3.0.0-denial-of-service-via-unbounded-recursion
Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Azure Cosmos DB allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Missing authentication for critical function in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.