Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Plow & HearthPlow & Hearth
VS
ConadConad
Plow & Hearth

Plow & Hearth

7021 Wolftown Hood Rd, Madison, 22727, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.plowandhearth.com
769/1000Fair

Founded in 1980 as a small country store, Plow & Hearth® has grown into a leading retailer of products for home, hearth, yard and garden. Successfully marketing these products through all three major channels - catalog, internet and retail stores - Plow & Hearth has evo...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:216
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Conad

Conad

Bologna, 40100, IT

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.conad.it
791/1000Fair

PERSONE OLTRE LE COSE. Conad è una storia fatta di imprenditori, commercianti, clienti e comunità. Un lungo viaggio che inizia nella metà degli anni ’60: nel 1962 nasce a Bologna il Consorzio Nazionale Dettaglianti, una società cooperativa a responsabilità limitata cost...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:12,798
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Plow & Hearth

Plow & Hearth

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Conad

Conad

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Plow & Hearth in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conad in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Plow & Hearth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Plow & Hearth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Conad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Plow & Hearth

Plow & Hearth

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PLO919072825
Conad

Conad

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Plow & Hearth company and Conad company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Plow & Hearth company and Conad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Plow & Hearth company and Conad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Plow & Hearth company and Conad company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Plow & Hearth company and Conad company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Plow & Hearth company and Conad company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Plow & Hearth company and Conad company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Plow & Hearth company and Conad company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Plow & Hearth company and Conad company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Plow & Hearth company and Conad company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Plow & Hearth company and Conad company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Plow & Hearth and Conad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Plow & Hearth and Conad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Plow & Hearth or Conad ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Plow & Hearth or Conad ?
Between Plow & Hearth and Conad, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Plow & Hearth and Conad, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2