Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
PLAYSTUDIOS

PLAYSTUDIOS Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

playstudios.com

COMPANY: Ordinarily, we would devote this space to telling you all the typical things about our innovative company, our experienced management team, and our inspiring culture. But talk is cheap. So instead, we'll let our work speak for us. At the end of the day, it is the ultimate reflection of who we are and what we value. And through this work, we hope that principles like creativity, quality, and fun are seen as more than empty aspirations. We hope that they are recognized as the defining attributes of all that we do. CULTURE: We believe that a company culture is not defined by a brightly colored office, a nice ping pong table, or a well-stocked kitchen. We believe it is revealed in the number of times each day that we laugh out loud,


PLAYSTUDIOS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

PLAYSTUDIOS
Company Information
Website:https://www.playstudios.com
Employees number:438
Number of followers:19,094
NAICS:51126
Industry Type:Computer Games
Homepage:playstudios.com
PLAYSTUDIOS Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 600 and 649
logo
PLAYSTUDIOSComputer Games
Updated:
30/06/2026
628/1000
Poor
Caa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
PLAYSTUDIOS Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
PLAYSTUDIOSComputer Games
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

PLAYSTUDIOS
PLAYSTUDIOSPoor
Current Score
628Caa (POOR)
01000
2 incidents
-115 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
633Before Incident
JULY 2026
631Before Incident
JUNE 2026
645Before Incident
MAY 2026
641Before Incident
APRIL 2026
641Before Incident
MARCH 2026
639Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
637Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
748Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Jan 2026PLAYSTUDIOS
LockBit and Play: Q1 2026 Ransomware Attacks Hits 2,122 Orgs Amid Fewer, More Impactful Groups

Ransomware Attacks Remain Elevated in Q1 2026, Driven by Consolidation Among Top Threat Groups

633After Incident
CRITICAL-115
LOCPLA1778660727
Ransomware Attacks Remain Elevated in Q1 2026, Driven by Consolidation Among Top Threat Groups Ransomware activity in the first quarter of 2026 sustained historically high levels, with 2,122 organizations listed on data leak sites (DLS) the second-highest Q1 total on record. According to Check Point Research’s State of Ransomware Q1 2026 report, the threat landscape is undergoing a structural shift, with a smaller number of groups now responsible for the majority of attacks. The top 10 ransomware groups accounted for 71% of all victims, a sharp increase from the fragmented ecosystem seen in 2025. Qilin retained its position as the most active group for the third consecutive quarter, claiming 338 victims, while LockBit re-emerged as a major player with 163 victims, signaling a recovery from 2024 law enforcement disruptions. Other prominent groups, including Akira and the rapidly rising The Gentlemen, contributed to the concentrated threat environment. A key trend in Q1 was the access-driven nature of attacks, with groups like The Gentlemen leveraging pre-compromised network access to execute rapid, large-scale campaigns. Unlike traditional ransomware operators, The Gentlemen targeted APAC and Latin America, deviating from the U.S.-centric focus of most groups only 13% of its victims were U.S.-based, compared to the ecosystem average of nearly 50%. This shift suggests attackers are increasingly exploiting regions where access is already established rather than pursuing high-value geographies. Geographic targeting varied significantly among groups. While the U.S. remained the most affected country (49.6% of victims), anomalies emerged Thailand accounted for 10.8% of victims, largely due to The Gentlemen’s operations. Meanwhile, Play ransomware maintained a hyper-focused approach, directing 85.1% of its attacks at U.S. organizations. Industries such as manufacturing, healthcare, and business services continued to bear the brunt of attacks, reflecting their operational complexity and sensitivity to downtime. The report also noted that LockBit’s resurgence included a strategic shift historically U.S.-focused, the group diversified its targets across Europe and Latin America, likely to mitigate law enforcement risks. With fewer, more capable groups dominating the landscape, ransomware campaigns are becoming more organized, scalable, and difficult to disrupt. The consolidation of power among top threat actors underscores a growing challenge for defenders, as attackers exploit weak points in network infrastructure, cloud environments, and access pathways.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gain
IMPACT
Data Compromised: YesOperational Impact: High (due to sensitivity to downtime)
DATA BREACH
Data Exfiltration: Yes (listed on data leak sites)Data Encryption: Yes (ransomware encryption)
DECEMBER 2025
748Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
748Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
748Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
748Before Incident
JANUARY 2018
749Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Jan 2018PLAYSTUDIOS
Ryuk, Rhysida, Conti and Play: SystemBC Malware Turns Windows Machines Into SOCKS5 Proxies for Ransomware Attacks

SystemBC Malware: A Persistent Proxy and RAT Tool in Ransomware Attacks

633After Incident
CRITICAL-116
BLUCONPLARYU1782822739
SystemBC Malware: A Persistent Proxy and RAT Tool in Ransomware Attacks SystemBC, also known as Coroxy, is a long-standing Windows malware family first detected in exploit kits around 2018–2019. Initially a secondary payload, it has since evolved into a widely used commodity tool, frequently deployed alongside loaders like Buer, QBot, and Emotet. Its lightweight, modular design and dual functionality as both a SOCKS5 proxy and remote-access trojan (RAT) make it a favored component in ransomware operations, including those linked to Ryuk, Conti, Egregor, BlackBasta, Play, and Rhysida. The malware follows a predictable infection lifecycle: after initial access, it copies itself into a randomly named file under `%ProgramData%`, establishes persistence via a registry Run key and scheduled task, and employs anti-detection measures such as skipping installation if security software like Emsisoft’s a2guard.exe is detected. Some variants use in-memory droppers to unpack secondary binaries, either injecting them into processes or executing them from disk. SystemBC’s defining feature is its SOCKS5 proxy capability, which allows attackers to route command-and-control (C2) and exfiltration traffic through compromised hosts. Newer versions increasingly use Tor for anonymity, blending malicious traffic with legitimate enterprise flows to evade detection. Operators manage live SOCKS sessions via a control panel that supports auto-updates, authentication, and tens of thousands of simultaneous connections. Early versions relied on encrypted beacons (RC4-encrypted host/user data) for C2 communication, while newer builds shift traffic to Tor using embedded directory-authority IPs. The malware supports a range of payloads EXE, DLL, shellcode, VBS, BAT, CMD, and PowerShell many executed in memory to avoid disk writes. For threat actors, SystemBC is rarely the end goal but a force multiplier, enabling stealthy lateral movement and tool reuse across access-as-a-service chains. Its presence often signals broader compromise, including credential theft and further malware deployment. Defenders are advised to monitor unusual outbound SOCKS/Tor connections, suspicious scheduled tasks, and in-memory execution techniques, while network segmentation and egress filtering can limit its impact.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MalwareRansomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gainData exfiltrationLateral movement
IMPACT
Windows

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for PLAYSTUDIOS ?
?
What was PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on PLAYSTUDIOS's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with PLAYSTUDIOS ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view PLAYSTUDIOS's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?