Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PlayDisplayPlayDisplay
VS
GoogleGoogle
PlayDisplay

PlayDisplay

Nizhnyaya Syromyatnicheskaya ulitsa 10, Moscow, 105120, RU

Last Update: 02/05/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://playdisplay.com/
640/1000Poor

PlayDisplay it is one of the fastest processive Augmented Reality App Development companies headquartered in Moscow, Russia with an satellite Development office in Saint Petersburg and representative office in Astana, Kazakhstan. Employing 25+ workforce across these th...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Google

Google

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, 94043, US

Last Update: 10/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://goo.gle/3DLEokh
161/1000Critical

A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that ma...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:313,465
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
47
Known data breaches
21
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PlayDisplay

PlayDisplay

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Google

Google

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

PlayDisplay has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Google has 4376.19% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - PlayDisplay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PlayDisplay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PlayDisplay

PlayDisplay

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PLAAKI1777681491
Google

Google

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GOOCOI1783686858
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
THECLOGOOTHE1782224973
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GOOTIK1781684782

FAQ

Between PlayDisplay company and Google company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PlayDisplay company and Google company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PlayDisplay company and Google company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PlayDisplay company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PlayDisplay company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PlayDisplay company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PlayDisplay company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PlayDisplay company and Google company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PlayDisplay company and Google company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PlayDisplay company and Google company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PlayDisplay company and Google company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PlayDisplay and Google, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PlayDisplay and Google, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PlayDisplay or Google ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PlayDisplay or Google ?
Between PlayDisplay and Google, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PlayDisplay and Google, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1