Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Platinum Federal Credit UnionPlatinum Federal Credit Union
VS
PT Bank Danamon Indonesia TbkPT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk
Platinum Federal Credit Union

Platinum Federal Credit Union

2035 Sugarloaf Circle, Duluth, 30097, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.platinumfcu.org
740/1000Moderate

Platinum Federal Credit Union (PFCU) is a not-for-profit financial cooperative. When you join the credit union, you become a shareholder (or an owner) of a very unique financial institution. Earnings above the required reserves are returned to you, in the form of lower ...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:69
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk

PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk

Jl. HR. Rasuna Said Blok C No. 10, Karet Setiabudi, JAKARTA, DKI Jakarta, ID, 12940

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.danamon.co.id
758/1000Fair

PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk (BEI: BDMN) didirikan pada tahun 1956. Per 31 Desember 2024, Danamon mengelola aset konsolidasian sebesar Rp242 triliun dengan anak perusahannya, Adira Finance. Dalam hal kepemilikan saham, 92,47% saham Danamon dimiliki oleh MUFG, dan 7,53%...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:10,623
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Platinum Federal Credit Union

Platinum Federal Credit Union

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk

PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Platinum Federal Credit Union in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Platinum Federal Credit Union (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Platinum Federal Credit Union cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Platinum Federal Credit Union

Platinum Federal Credit Union

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PLA3893638100225
PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk

PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Platinum Federal Credit Union company and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union company and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union company and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union company and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union company and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union company and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union company and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union company and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union company and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union company and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union company and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Platinum Federal Credit Union or PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Platinum Federal Credit Union or PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Platinum Federal Credit Union and PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58489
SUMMARY

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time collaborative markdown notes application. Prior to 1.11.0, the GitHub Gist export flow created an OAuth2  state  value but only checked that it was present rather than validating it against the value expected for the user's session. Because the state was not properly validated, an attacker could forge a callback URL containing their own valid GitHub OAuth code. When processing the callback, HedgeDoc used the victim's logged-in session to select which note to export, but the attacker's authorization code to determine which GitHub account received it. As a result, a logged-in victim who clicked a crafted link could export their own private, protected, or limited note directly into a Gist controlled by the attacker. This issue has been fixed in version 1.11.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-13
UPDATED
Date2026-07-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-58486
SUMMARY

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to version 1.11.0, HedgeDoc was vulnerable to a YAML alias bomb due to unsafe processing of the note frontmatter. HedgeDoc parsed frontmatter with js-yaml.load (js-yaml v3) via @hedgedoc/meta-marked, which resolved YAML anchor aliases. A compact malicious payload could therefore expand into a huge object structure, consuming excessive CPU. This expansion ran on every request to the publish view (/s/<shortid>) and, when placed under the opengraph key, the editor view (/<noteId>). A ten-level alias bomb could block the single Node.js event loop for roughly 235 seconds per request, causing concurrent requests to hang or drop and rendering the instance unavailable (DoS). Because the note was stored in the database, the impact survived process restarts until the note was removed. toobusy-js did not reliably mitigate the worst cases, as the event loop was saturated before the middleware could respond. This issue was fixed in version 1.11.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-13
UPDATED
Date2026-07-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-58102
SUMMARY

Crypt::OpenSSL::X509 versions before 2.1.3 for Perl allow a heap out-of-bounds read via a long certificate extension OID in hv_exts. When building the extension hash (via extensions(), extensions_by_long_name(), extensions_by_oid(), or has_extension_oid()), the code passes OBJ_obj2txt()'s return value as the hash-key length; because that value is the OID's full text length rather than the bytes written to the fixed-size buffer (129 bytes), an OID whose text is longer than the 129-byte buffer causes a read past the allocation, exposing adjacent heap memory as the returned hash key. extensions_by_name() uses the static shortname path and is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-13
UPDATED
Date2026-07-13
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-58101
SUMMARY

Crypt::OpenSSL::X509 versions before 2.1.3 for Perl allow denial of service via NULL pointer dereference. X509V3_EXT_d2i(ext) returns NULL when an extension's DER value fails to parse. basicC, ia5string, and auth_att dereference its result without a NULL check. keyid_data also dereferences akid->keyid, which is NULL for an empty AKI SEQUENCE (DER 30 00) even when the parse succeeds. A caller invoking an affected helper on an extension from an untrusted certificate triggers a SIGSEGV that crashes the Perl process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-13
UPDATED
Date2026-07-13
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-57856
SUMMARY

Cockpit CMS contains a path traversal vulnerability in the Bucket file storage API (/system/buckets/api). The api() method in modules/System/Controller/Buckets.php sanitizes the bucket name with preg_replace('/[^a-zA-Z0-9-_\\.]/','', $bucket), which permits '..' and '../' sequences. The sanitized value is interpolated into a Flysystem path as uploads://buckets/{bucket}. Flysystem's WhitespacePathNormalizer resolves 'buckets/..' to the empty string (the uploads storage root) without raising PathTraversalDetected because the '..' has a preceding component to consume. An authenticated low-privileged user can send a crafted request with a '../' bucket name to list, upload, and delete files across all buckets, including those belonging to other users or roles

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-13
UPDATED
Date2026-07-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8