Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PlatedPlated
VS
JDE Peet'sJDE Peet's
Plated

Plated

111 W. 19th Street, New York, New York, 10011, US

Last Update: 09/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.plated.com
763/1000Fair

Plated is dedicated to changing the way people experience food and the moments that surround it. Launched in 2012 by Nick Taranto, Josh Hix, and Elana Karp, Plated helps people who are passionate about food create incredible home-cooked meals and share them with the peo...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:237
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
JDE Peet's

JDE Peet's

Oosterdoksstraat 80, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1011 DK

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.jdepeets.com/
801/1000Good

JDE Peet’s is the world’s leading pure-play coffee company, serving approximately 4,400 cups of coffee per second in more than 100 markets. Guided by our ‘Reignite the Amazing’ strategy, we are focusing on brand-led growth across three big bets: Peet’s, L’OR, and Jacobs...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:10,426
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Plated

Plated

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
JDE Peet's

JDE Peet's

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Plated in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JDE Peet's in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Plated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Plated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - JDE Peet's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JDE Peet's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Plated

Plated

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
JDE Peet's

JDE Peet's

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Plated company and JDE Peet's company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Plated company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Plated company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Plated company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Plated company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Plated company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Plated company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Plated company and JDE Peet's company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Plated company and JDE Peet's company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Plated company and JDE Peet's company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Plated company and JDE Peet's company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Plated and JDE Peet's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Plated and JDE Peet's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Plated or JDE Peet's ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Plated or JDE Peet's ?
Between Plated and JDE Peet's, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Plated and JDE Peet's, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8