Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PlanGrid, an Autodesk companyPlanGrid, an Autodesk company
VS
TOTVSTOTVS
PlanGrid, an Autodesk company

PlanGrid, an Autodesk company

2111 Mission St, San Francisco, CA, 94110, US

Last Update: 07/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.plangrid.com
750/1000Fair

PlanGrid builds simple, powerful software construction teams love to use. The company’s mobile-first technology gives general contractors, subs, owners and architects access to information in real-time, enables greater collaboration and provides actionable insights. Wit...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:25
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TOTVS

TOTVS

Av Braz Leme, 1000, Sao Paulo, 02511-900, BR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.totvs.com
767/1000Fair

Olá, somos a TOTVS! A maior empresa de tecnologia do Brasil. 🤓 Líder absoluta em sistemas e plataformas para empresas, a TOTVS possui mais de 70 mil clientes. Indo muito além do ERP, oferece tecnologia completa para digitalização dos negócios por meio de 3 unidades de...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:16,566
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PlanGrid, an Autodesk company

PlanGrid, an Autodesk company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TOTVS

TOTVS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PlanGrid, an Autodesk company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TOTVS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PlanGrid, an Autodesk company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PlanGrid, an Autodesk company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TOTVS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TOTVS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PlanGrid, an Autodesk company

PlanGrid, an Autodesk company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TOTVS

TOTVS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company company and TOTVS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company company and TOTVS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company company and TOTVS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company company and TOTVS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company company and TOTVS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company and TOTVS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company and TOTVS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PlanGrid, an Autodesk company or TOTVS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PlanGrid, an Autodesk company or TOTVS ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company and TOTVS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PlanGrid, an Autodesk company and TOTVS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2