Comparison Overview
PlainsCapital Bank

PlainsCapital Bank
6565 Hillcrest Ave, Dallas, 75205, US
Last Update: 31/03/2026
PlainsCapital Bank, the eighth-largest Texas-headquartered bank by deposit market share, operates 55 Texas branches and has approximately 1,040 employees providing highly personalized relationship banking through a single point of contact. Offering commercial lending, t...

RBC
200 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5J 2J5
Last Update: 03/09/2026
Royal Bank of Canada is a global financial institution with a purpose-driven, principles-led approach to delivering leading performance. Our success comes from the 94,000+ employees who leverage their imaginations and insights to bring our vision, values and strategy to...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

PlainsCapital Bank







RBC






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PlainsCapital Bank in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for RBC in 2026.
Incident History - PlainsCapital Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PlainsCapital Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - RBC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
RBC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

PlainsCapital Bank

RBC
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.