Comparison Overview
Plaid Enterprises

Plaid Enterprises
3225 Westech Dr, Peachtree Corners, Georgia, 30092, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Plaid Enterprises, Inc., is one of the world's largest, most diverse manufacturers of creative do-it-yourself products. Our product innovation and dedication to the ever-changing needs of consumers have made the Plaid family of products among the most recognized and des...

Lavoratore autonomo
Via Fiorentina , 87, AREZZO, 52100, IT
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Progettazione Grafica, Stampa digitale e Stampa Offset. Operiamo con l'obbiettivo di offrire un servizio completo ai nostri clienti, Fotografia_Progettazione grafica_Stampa Gestione Vostri File sia su piattaforma MAC_Windows Per le aziende in grado di fornire il f...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Plaid Enterprises







Lavoratore autonomo






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Art Supplies Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Plaid Enterprises in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Art Supplies Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lavoratore autonomo in 2026.
Incident History - Plaid Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Plaid Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lavoratore autonomo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lavoratore autonomo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Plaid Enterprises

Lavoratore autonomo
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.