Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PJSC "Rosseti"​PJSC "Rosseti"​
VS
CB&ICB&I
PJSC "Rosseti"​

PJSC "Rosseti"​

Moscow City, RU

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rosseti.ru/eng/
793/1000Fair

Rosseti, Public Joint Stock Company (PJSC ROSSETI) – an operator of energy grids in Russia, is one of the largest electric companies in the world. The company maintains 2.30 million km of power transmission lines, 490,000 substations with transformer capacity of more th...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:124
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
CB&I

CB&I

1725 Hughes Landing Blvd, The Woodlands, 77380, US

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cbi.com/
772/1000Fair

CB&I is the world’s leading designer and builder of storage facilities, tanks, and terminals. With more than 60,000 structures completed throughout its 135+ year history, CB&I has the global expertise and strategically located operations to provide its customers world-c...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:11,368
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PJSC "Rosseti"​

PJSC "Rosseti"​

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CB&I

CB&I

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PJSC "Rosseti"​ in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CB&I in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PJSC "Rosseti"​ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PJSC "Rosseti"​ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CB&I (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CB&I cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PJSC "Rosseti"​

PJSC "Rosseti"​

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PJS000032925
CB&I

CB&I

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ company and CB&I company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ company and CB&I company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ company and CB&I company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ company and CB&I company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ company and CB&I company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ company and CB&I company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ company and CB&I company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ company and CB&I company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ company and CB&I company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ company and CB&I company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ company and CB&I company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ and CB&I, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ and CB&I, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PJSC "Rosseti"​ or CB&I ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PJSC "Rosseti"​ or CB&I ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ and CB&I, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PJSC "Rosseti"​ and CB&I, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8