Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PITT COUNTY SCHOOLSPITT COUNTY SCHOOLS
VS
Orange County Public SchoolsOrange County Public Schools
PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS

PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS

N/A

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.pittschools.org
743/1000Moderate

Pitt County Schools is a dynamic, thriving public school system, located in Eastern North Carolina. Our system includes 38 campuses from Pre-K Centers, Elementary, K-8, Middle, High School, and two Early Colleges. Mission: Pitt County Schools will lead collaboration b...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:2,125
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Orange County Public Schools

Orange County Public Schools

445 W. Amelia St., Orlando, 32801, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ocps.net
791/1000Fair

Orange County Public Schools is recognized as one of the top urban school districts in the nation – the 8th largest school district in America (4th in Florida) with 210 traditional schools, approximately 206,000 students and over 24,000 employees. OCPS students enjoy...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:18,502
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS

PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Orange County Public Schools

Orange County Public Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS has 21.26% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orange County Public Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Orange County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS

PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
INSPIT1778174944
Orange County Public Schools

Orange County Public Schools

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS company and Orange County Public Schools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS and Orange County Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS and Orange County Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS or Orange County Public Schools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS or Orange County Public Schools ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS and Orange County Public Schools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS and Orange County Public Schools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA