Comparison Overview
Piraeus

Piraeus
4 Amerikis street, Athens, 10564, GR
Last Update: 20/02/2026
Piraeus was founded in 1916; it is headquartered in Athens and is listed on the Athens Stock Exchange. Today it represents the leading Bank in Greece in terms of customer loans and deposits. The Bank maintains the largest distribution network in Greece and offers a vast...

Banco Azteca
Av. Insurgentes Sur 3579, México, 14020, MX
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Banco Azteca es un banco mexicano fundado en el año 2002 y es una compañía de Grupo Salinas del empresario Mexicano Ricardo Salinas Pliego. Cuenta con 1,500 sucursales en México, Panamá, Argentina, Honduras, El Salvador, Brasil y Perú; es uno de los dos bancos más grand...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Piraeus







Banco Azteca






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Piraeus in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Banco Azteca in 2026.
Incident History - Piraeus (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Piraeus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Banco Azteca (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Banco Azteca cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Piraeus

Banco Azteca
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.