Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pipelife Nederland B.V.Pipelife Nederland B.V.
VS
Berry Global, Inc.Berry Global, Inc.
Pipelife Nederland B.V.

Pipelife Nederland B.V.

Flevolaan 7, Enkhuizen, Noord Holland, 1601 MA, NL

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.pipelife.nl
742/1000Moderate

Pipelife is één van de grootste producenten van kunststof leidingsystemen in Europa. Sinds 1947 ontwikkelt, produceert en levert de vestiging in Enkhuizen een compleet en trendsettend programma. Het is onze missie om duurzame oplossingen te bieden voor alle stromen va...

NAICS:3261
NAICS Definition:Plastics Product Manufacturing
Employees:136
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Berry Global, Inc.

Berry Global, Inc.

101 Oakley Street, Evansville, IN, US, 47710

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.berryglobal.com
767/1000Fair

Berry Global, Inc. has merged with Amcor as of April 30, 2025. As a global leader in packaging solutions for consumer and healthcare products, our industry-leading innovation capabilities, global scale and technical expertise help our customers grow and meet the needs...

NAICS:3261
NAICS Definition:Plastics Product Manufacturing
Employees:11,135
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pipelife Nederland B.V.

Pipelife Nederland B.V.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Berry Global, Inc.

Berry Global, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Plastics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pipelife Nederland B.V. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Plastics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Berry Global, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pipelife Nederland B.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pipelife Nederland B.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Berry Global, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Berry Global, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pipelife Nederland B.V.

Pipelife Nederland B.V.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Berry Global, Inc.

Berry Global, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. company and Berry Global, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. and Berry Global, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. and Berry Global, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pipelife Nederland B.V. or Berry Global, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pipelife Nederland B.V. or Berry Global, Inc. ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. and Berry Global, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pipelife Nederland B.V. and Berry Global, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1