Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumiPipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi
VS
ASSA ABLOY GroupASSA ABLOY Group
Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi

Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi

Kārļa Ulmaņa gatve 2, Riga, undefined, LV-1004, LV

Last Update: 04/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.pipelife.lv/
744/1000Moderate

Turpmāk Pipelife kā daļa no wienerberger zīmola - kopā veidojam labāku nākotni. 2024. gada augusts iezīmējas ar jaunu posmu Pipelife attīstībā, esam lepni turpmāk būt daļa no wienerberger zīmola. Šī Pipelife zīmola attīstība iezīmē pamatu turpmākai izaugsmei kopā ar m...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:8
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ASSA ABLOY Group

ASSA ABLOY Group

Klarabergsviadukten 90, Stockholm, SE-10723, SE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
802/1000Good

Let’s create a safer and more open world – together! ASSA ABLOY is the global leader in access solutions with sales of SEK 150 billion and 63,000 employees. The Group has operations in over 70 countries and sales worldwide. ASSA ABLOY’s innovations enable safe, secure ...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:12,343
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi

Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ASSA ABLOY Group

ASSA ABLOY Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ASSA ABLOY Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ASSA ABLOY Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASSA ABLOY Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi

Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ASSA ABLOY Group

ASSA ABLOY Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi company and ASSA ABLOY Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi company and ASSA ABLOY Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi company and ASSA ABLOY Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi company and ASSA ABLOY Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi company and ASSA ABLOY Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi company and ASSA ABLOY Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi company and ASSA ABLOY Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi company and ASSA ABLOY Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi company and ASSA ABLOY Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi company and ASSA ABLOY Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi company and ASSA ABLOY Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi and ASSA ABLOY Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi and ASSA ABLOY Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi or ASSA ABLOY Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi or ASSA ABLOY Group ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi and ASSA ABLOY Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pipelife Latvia | Ilgtspējīgi cauruļvadu risinājumi and ASSA ABLOY Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA