Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pipefish Pty LtdPipefish Pty Ltd
VS
Chinasoft InternationalChinasoft International
Pipefish Pty Ltd

Pipefish Pty Ltd

Brisbane City, Brisbane, 4000, AU

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pipefish.com.au/
753/1000Fair

Pipefish are enterprise IT implementation specialists with an extensive track record for controlled project delivery in large and complex organisations. We combine capability and dedication to deliver business outcomes with unprecedented regularity. We work collaborativ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Chinasoft International

Chinasoft International

海淀区中关村科学南路, 北京, CN

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile

Chinasoft International Limited (CSI. 00354.HK), founded in 2000, is an industry leader in globalized software and information technology services, with branches in 28 cities across China including Beijing, Xi’an, Nanjing, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Hong Kong and 18 cities in ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:8,188
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pipefish Pty Ltd

Pipefish Pty Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Chinasoft International

Chinasoft International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pipefish Pty Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chinasoft International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pipefish Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pipefish Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Chinasoft International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chinasoft International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pipefish Pty Ltd

Pipefish Pty Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Chinasoft International

Chinasoft International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pipefish Pty Ltd company and Chinasoft International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd company and Chinasoft International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd company and Chinasoft International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd company and Chinasoft International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd company and Chinasoft International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd company and Chinasoft International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd company and Chinasoft International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd company and Chinasoft International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd company and Chinasoft International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd company and Chinasoft International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd company and Chinasoft International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd and Chinasoft International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd and Chinasoft International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pipefish Pty Ltd or Chinasoft International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pipefish Pty Ltd or Chinasoft International ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd and Chinasoft International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pipefish Pty Ltd and Chinasoft International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-26422
SUMMARY

clash-verge-service-ipc before 2.3.0 has a world-reachable IPC endpoint, leading to local privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-11441
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This vulnerability affects the function canAccessIssue of the file /issues/ of the component Pull Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument issue leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to resolve this issue. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11440
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This affects an unknown part of the file /repositories/{projectId}/default-branch of the component REST API. This manipulation of the argument project.defaultBranch causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to mitigate this issue. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11439
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /projects/ of the component Parent Project Handler. The manipulation of the argument project.parentId results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 can resolve this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11438
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /projects. The manipulation of the argument project.forkedFromId leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 addresses this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8