Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pingora Asset Management LLCPingora Asset Management LLC
VS
Danske BankDanske Bank
Pingora Asset Management LLC

Pingora Asset Management LLC

1755 Blake Street, Denver, 80202, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
504/1000Critical

Pingora Asset Management LLC, (“Pingora”), is a specialized asset manager focused on investing in and servicing of new production performing mortgage servicing right (“MSR”) portfolios. Founded by Michael Lau in 2012, Pingora plans to capitalize on recently formed oppo...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:24
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Danske Bank

Danske Bank

Bernstorffsgade 40, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, DK, 1577

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.danskebank.com
809/1000Good

Danske Bank – A driver of growth and development For more than a 150 years, Danske Bank has strived to be a driver of growth and development in society. We have developed in tandem with the societies we are part of, and our advisory services, expertise and financial so...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:18,488
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pingora Asset Management LLC

Pingora Asset Management LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Danske Bank

Danske Bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Pingora Asset Management LLC has 45.36% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danske Bank in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pingora Asset Management LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pingora Asset Management LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Danske Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danske Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pingora Asset Management LLC

Pingora Asset Management LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAKPINBAY1774312810
🔒 Incident : Breach
PIN523072625
Danske Bank

Danske Bank

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pingora Asset Management LLC company and Danske Bank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC company and Danske Bank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC company and Danske Bank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC company and Danske Bank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC company and Danske Bank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC company and Danske Bank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC and Danske Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC and Danske Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pingora Asset Management LLC or Danske Bank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pingora Asset Management LLC or Danske Bank ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC and Danske Bank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pingora Asset Management LLC and Danske Bank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3