Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pingo DocePingo Doce
VS
ArbonneArbonne
Pingo Doce

Pingo Doce

Rua Actor António Silva n.º7, Lisboa, undefined, 1649-033 Lisboa, PT

Last Update: 24/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.pingodoce.pt/
786/1000Fair

With more than 400 stores spread across 300 locations throughout the country, we’re the leading chain in the supermarket segment in Portugal, offering high quality food products at competitive prices.

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:7,873
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Arbonne

Arbonne

19800 MacArthur Blvd, Irvine, California, US, 92612

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.arbonne.com
774/1000Fair

Arbonne, creates personal skincare and wellness products that are crafted with premium botanical ingredients and innovative scientific discovery. Delivering on the Company’s commitment to pure, safe and beneficial products, Arbonne’s personal care and nutrition formulas...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:14,420
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pingo Doce

Pingo Doce

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Arbonne

Arbonne

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pingo Doce in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arbonne in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pingo Doce (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pingo Doce cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Arbonne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arbonne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pingo Doce

Pingo Doce

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Arbonne

Arbonne

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ARB1315301222

FAQ

Between Pingo Doce company and Arbonne company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pingo Doce company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pingo Doce company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pingo Doce company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pingo Doce company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pingo Doce company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pingo Doce company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pingo Doce company and Arbonne company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pingo Doce company and Arbonne company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pingo Doce company and Arbonne company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pingo Doce company and Arbonne company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pingo Doce and Arbonne, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pingo Doce and Arbonne, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pingo Doce or Arbonne ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pingo Doce or Arbonne ?
Between Pingo Doce and Arbonne, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pingo Doce and Arbonne, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES