Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁
VS
SiemensSiemens
Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

松山區八德路三段36號10樓, 台北市, 10559, TW

Last Update: 02/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.pilz.com/tw-TW
745/1000Moderate

Pilz 是安全自動化產品、系統及服務的專業供應商,總部位於德國奧斯菲爾,在全球有2400員工和42家分公司,專為人員、機械設備及環境提供安全解決方案。 身為全球技術領導品牌,Pilz產品包含感測器技術、電子式監控繼電器、安全繼電器、可程式控制系統、運動控制技術的自動化解決方案、工業用通訊協定系統,以及圖像顯示解決方案與操作終端機。 此外,Pilz服務也包含安全諮詢、工程設計及訓練,如安全風險評估,歐盟CE認證以及CMSE機械安全專家認證課程。

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Siemens

Siemens

Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 1, Munich, 80333, DE

Last Update: 02/08/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.siemens.com
785/1000Fair

Siemens AG (Berlin and Munich) is a leading technology company focused on industry, infrastructure, mobility, and healthcare. The company’s purpose is to create technology to transform the everyday, for everyone. By combining the real and the digital worlds, Siemens emp...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:277,193
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Siemens

Siemens

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Siemens has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Siemens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siemens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Siemens

Siemens

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SCHMAPSOUSIEROC1785680820
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
LIT1781000708
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AQU1774671948

FAQ

Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Siemens company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Siemens company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Siemens company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Siemens company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Siemens company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Siemens company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Siemens company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and Siemens, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and Siemens, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 or Siemens ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 or Siemens ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and Siemens, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and Siemens, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-78147
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in ggml-org llama.cpp bec4772f6. The impacted element is the function deserialize_tensor of the file ggml/src/ggml-rpc/ggml-rpc.cpp of the component ggml-RPC Server. Performing a manipulation of the argument op/op_params results in deserialization. The attack may be initiated remotely. This vulnerability is distinct from CVE-2026-34159 (GHSA-j8rj-fmpv-wcxw, PR #20908), which only added a buffer==nullptr rejection in create_node() and does not validate op or op_params. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-23
UPDATED
Date2026-08-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78145
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in CTFd up to 3.8.4. The affected element is the function _is_safe_url of the file CTFd/utils/validators/__init__.py. Such manipulation of the argument Next leads to open redirect. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The name of the patch is 5d8515842fd1ab2c3a9f2dde9ffca907aa334ea9. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-23
UPDATED
Date2026-08-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-78144
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in code-projects Barangay Resident Profiling Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /boarders.php of the component Boarder Management Module. Such manipulation of the argument ID leads to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-23
UPDATED
Date2026-08-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-78143
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in code-projects Barangay Resident Profiling Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file residents.php of the component Resident Search Functionality. This manipulation of the argument Search causes sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-23
UPDATED
Date2026-08-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78142
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in code-projects Barangay Resident Profiling Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /archived_records.php of the component Restore/Delete. The manipulation of the argument resident_id results in authorization bypass. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-23
UPDATED
Date2026-08-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8