Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁
VS
Honeywell TechnologiesHoneywell Technologies
Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

松山區八德路三段36號10樓, 台北市, 10559, TW

Last Update: 02/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.pilz.com/tw-TW
745/1000Moderate

Pilz 是安全自動化產品、系統及服務的專業供應商,總部位於德國奧斯菲爾,在全球有2400員工和42家分公司,專為人員、機械設備及環境提供安全解決方案。 身為全球技術領導品牌,Pilz產品包含感測器技術、電子式監控繼電器、安全繼電器、可程式控制系統、運動控制技術的自動化解決方案、工業用通訊協定系統,以及圖像顯示解決方案與操作終端機。 此外,Pilz服務也包含安全諮詢、工程設計及訓練,如安全風險評估,歐盟CE認證以及CMSE機械安全專家認證課程。

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Honeywell Technologies

Honeywell Technologies

Honeywell International Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28202

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.honeywell.com
783/1000Fair

Honeywell Technologies is a global, pure-play automation company with a legacy of innovating to help solve the world’s most mission-critical challenges, enhancing the quality of life for people and communities around the world. We serve the building, industrial, and pro...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:128,847
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Honeywell Technologies

Honeywell Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Honeywell Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Honeywell Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Honeywell Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Honeywell Technologies

Honeywell Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HON859080425
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HON848072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
FLEHON1766476588

FAQ

Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and Honeywell Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and Honeywell Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 or Honeywell Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 or Honeywell Technologies ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and Honeywell Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and Honeywell Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-108773
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in erzhongxmu JEEWMS up to 2026.09.27-W39. Impacted is the function docheck of the file src/main/java/com/zzjee/wm/controller/WmOmNoticeHController.java. Performing a manipulation of the argument goodscode results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108772
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in bleenco abstruse up to 2.1.0. This issue affects the function filepath.Join of the file server/api/worker/download_cache.go of the component Cache Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument File leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-108770
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Appwrite up to 2.3.0. This vulnerability affects the function PublicHostname of the file src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Avatars/Http/Screenshots/Get.php of the component Browser Screenshot Service. This manipulation of the argument url causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 2.4.0 is able to resolve this issue. Patch name: 393255e7302ae5503331d45802e2eee01c6a47fe. You should upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-108978
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Samsung Opensource rlottie allows Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables. This issue affects rlottie: e57b094f03c39a751a1fded6f7d6c13f1ed95ec9.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-108769
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.2.0. This affects an unknown part of the file Markdown.tsx of the component Markdown Rendering. The manipulation results in denial of service. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8