Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁
VS
ABBABB
Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

松山區八德路三段36號10樓, 台北市, 10559, TW

Last Update: 02/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.pilz.com/tw-TW
745/1000Moderate

Pilz 是安全自動化產品、系統及服務的專業供應商,總部位於德國奧斯菲爾,在全球有2400員工和42家分公司,專為人員、機械設備及環境提供安全解決方案。 身為全球技術領導品牌,Pilz產品包含感測器技術、電子式監控繼電器、安全繼電器、可程式控制系統、運動控制技術的自動化解決方案、工業用通訊協定系統,以及圖像顯示解決方案與操作終端機。 此外,Pilz服務也包含安全諮詢、工程設計及訓練,如安全風險評估,歐盟CE認證以及CMSE機械安全專家認證課程。

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ABB

ABB

Affolternstrasse 44, Zurich, 8050, CH

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://social.abb/website
815/1000Good

ABB is a technology leader in electrification and automation, enabling a more sustainable and resource-efficient future. The company’s solutions connect engineering know-how and software to optimize how things are manufactured, moved, powered and operated. Building on o...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:134,646
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ABB

ABB

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABB in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ABB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ABB

ABB

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ABB02812623
🔒 Incident : Breach
ABB225090125

FAQ

Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and ABB company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and ABB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and ABB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and ABB company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and ABB company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and ABB company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 company and ABB company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and ABB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and ABB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 or ABB ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 or ABB ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and ABB, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pilz Taiwan 臺灣皮爾磁 and ABB, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-22061
SUMMARY

Trident versions v25.02.1 through v26.06.1 are susceptible to a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with access to debug logs to view LUKS passphrases or SMB Active Directory credentials.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108269
SUMMARY

Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.5.0, the Rust and Go RA-TLS challenge verifiers accepted quote ReportData that was bound to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session before permitting application traffic. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing the clients to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in 0.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108268
SUMMARY

Enclave OS Virtual runs container workloads inside confidential virtual machines with end-to-end attestation. Prior to tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27, the TDX/GPU RA-TLS certificate issuer placed the certificate public-key hash and client nonce in quote ReportData but omitted a value bound to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-108267
SUMMARY

Privasys Go is a maintained fork of the Go programming language that adds RA-TLS support to crypto/tls. Prior to privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5, challenge-mode RA-TLS certificates bound quote ReportData to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept a handshake terminated by the attacker as an attested enclave connection. This issue is fixed in privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-92705
SUMMARY

Aegisub is a cross-platform advanced subtitle editor. From 3.2.0 to 3.4.2, Aegisub automatically loads Automation scripts referenced by `Automation Scripts` metadata in `ASS` subtitle projects without asking whether the user trusts the scripts or their authors. An attacker can distribute a crafted `ASS` file together with a referenced malicious Automation script, and opening the `AS`  file executes arbitrary code with the privileges of the Aegisub process. From 3.4.0 to 3.4.2, inconsistent handling of embedded `NUL` characters between extension validation and filesystem operations additionally allows a crafted `ASS/Lua` polyglot to reference and execute itself as a single-file variant. The vulnerability is fixed in Aegisub 3.5.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-09
UPDATED
Date2026-10-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8