Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pilz ÖsterreichPilz Österreich
VS
PT Astra International TbkPT Astra International Tbk
Pilz Österreich

Pilz Österreich

Wagramer Straße 19, Wien, 1220, AT

Last Update: 03/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.pilz.at
744/1000Moderate

Als globaler Anbieter von Produkten, Systemen und Dienstleistungen für die Automatisierungstechnik, kann Pilz im Jahr 2023 auf eine 75-jährige Erfolgsgeschichte zurückblicken: 1948 gegründet, beschäftigt die Pilz Gruppe heute rund 2.500 Mitarbeiter in 42 Tochtergesellsc...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:37
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PT Astra International Tbk

PT Astra International Tbk

Jl. Jenderal Sudirman, Kav-5-6, Central Jakarta, 10220, ID

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.astra.co.id
781/1000Fair

Astra was established in 1957 as a trading company. Over the course of its development, Astra has formed a number of strategic alliances with leading global players. Since 1990, the Company has been listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Astra currently engages ...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:16,009
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pilz Österreich

Pilz Österreich

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PT Astra International Tbk

PT Astra International Tbk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pilz Österreich in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Astra International Tbk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pilz Österreich (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pilz Österreich cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PT Astra International Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Astra International Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pilz Österreich

Pilz Österreich

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PT Astra International Tbk

PT Astra International Tbk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pilz Österreich company and PT Astra International Tbk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pilz Österreich company and PT Astra International Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pilz Österreich company and PT Astra International Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pilz Österreich company and PT Astra International Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pilz Österreich company and PT Astra International Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pilz Österreich company and PT Astra International Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pilz Österreich company and PT Astra International Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pilz Österreich company and PT Astra International Tbk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pilz Österreich company and PT Astra International Tbk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pilz Österreich company and PT Astra International Tbk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pilz Österreich company and PT Astra International Tbk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pilz Österreich and PT Astra International Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pilz Österreich and PT Astra International Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pilz Österreich or PT Astra International Tbk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pilz Österreich or PT Astra International Tbk ?
Between Pilz Österreich and PT Astra International Tbk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pilz Österreich and PT Astra International Tbk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2