Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AspenPointe Health ServicesAspenPointe Health Services
VS
TED ConferencesTED Conferences
AspenPointe Health Services

AspenPointe Health Services

US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.aspenpointe.org
813/1000Good

One of the largest nonprofits in Colorado Springs, AspenPointe traces its roots back to 1875 when it was called the Springs Relief Society. That organization, which delivered coal, lumber and clothing to the needy, was the genesis of what today is 12 organizations that ...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:46
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
TED Conferences

TED Conferences

330 Hudson Street, New York, 10013, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.TED.com
846/1000Good

TED’s mission is to discover and champion the ideas that will shape tomorrow. Powerful ideas, powerfully presented, can move us to feel something, to think differently, to take action and create a brighter future. TED finds these powerful ideas across disciplines and a...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:15,408
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AspenPointe Health Services

AspenPointe Health Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TED Conferences

TED Conferences

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AspenPointe Health Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TED Conferences in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AspenPointe Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AspenPointe Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TED Conferences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TED Conferences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AspenPointe Health Services

AspenPointe Health Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
ASP9204623
TED Conferences

TED Conferences

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AspenPointe Health Services company and TED Conferences company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services company and TED Conferences company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services company and TED Conferences company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services company and TED Conferences company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services company and TED Conferences company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services and TED Conferences, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services and TED Conferences, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AspenPointe Health Services or TED Conferences ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AspenPointe Health Services or TED Conferences ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services and TED Conferences, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AspenPointe Health Services and TED Conferences, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2