Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pierre et Vacances EuropePierre et Vacances Europe
VS
Marriott InternationalMarriott International
Pierre et Vacances Europe

Pierre et Vacances Europe

11 rue de Cambrai, Paris, 75019, FR

Last Update: 18/05/2026

View Profile
668/1000Weak

📢 If you’re following this page, it’s not just to see sunsets and snow-capped peaks in your LinkedIn feed. It’s to follow the transformation of a French brand that is reinventing local tourism on a European scale. With nearly 60 years of experience in the tourism land...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:796
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Marriott International

Marriott International

10400 Fernwood Road, Bethesda, MD, US, 20817

Last Update: 03/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.marriott.com
712/1000Moderate

Marriott International, Inc. is based in Bethesda, Maryland, USA, and encompasses a portfolio of approximately 9,000 properties across more than 30 leading brands in 141 countries and territories. Its heritage can be traced to a root beer stand opened in Washington, D....

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:213,175
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pierre et Vacances Europe

Pierre et Vacances Europe

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marriott International

Marriott International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

Pierre et Vacances Europe has 34.21% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

Marriott International has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Pierre et Vacances Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pierre et Vacances Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marriott International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marriott International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pierre et Vacances Europe

Pierre et Vacances Europe

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BELGÎTPIE1779092832
Marriott International

Marriott International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHEGAS1776335039
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAR0802208101125
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAR13023722

FAQ

Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and Marriott International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and Marriott International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and Marriott International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and Marriott International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and Marriott International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe and Marriott International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe and Marriott International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pierre et Vacances Europe or Marriott International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pierre et Vacances Europe or Marriott International ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe and Marriott International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe and Marriott International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA