Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pierre et Vacances EuropePierre et Vacances Europe
VS
DoubleTree by HiltonDoubleTree by Hilton
Pierre et Vacances Europe

Pierre et Vacances Europe

11 rue de Cambrai, Paris, 75019, FR

Last Update: 18/05/2026

View Profile
668/1000Weak

📢 If you’re following this page, it’s not just to see sunsets and snow-capped peaks in your LinkedIn feed. It’s to follow the transformation of a French brand that is reinventing local tourism on a European scale. With nearly 60 years of experience in the tourism land...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:796
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
DoubleTree by Hilton

DoubleTree by Hilton

7930 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.doubletree.com
797/1000Fair

DoubleTree by Hilton hotels are distinctively designed properties that provide true comfort to today’s business and leisure travelers. From the millions of delighted hotel guests who are welcomed with the brand’s legendary, warm chocolate chip cookies at check-in to the...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:15,542
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pierre et Vacances Europe

Pierre et Vacances Europe

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DoubleTree by Hilton

DoubleTree by Hilton

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

Pierre et Vacances Europe has 34.21% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DoubleTree by Hilton in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pierre et Vacances Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pierre et Vacances Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DoubleTree by Hilton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DoubleTree by Hilton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pierre et Vacances Europe

Pierre et Vacances Europe

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BELGÎTPIE1779092832
DoubleTree by Hilton

DoubleTree by Hilton

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe company and DoubleTree by Hilton company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe and DoubleTree by Hilton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe and DoubleTree by Hilton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pierre et Vacances Europe or DoubleTree by Hilton ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pierre et Vacances Europe or DoubleTree by Hilton ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe and DoubleTree by Hilton, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pierre et Vacances Europe and DoubleTree by Hilton, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2