Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pierre Fabre LaboratoriesPierre Fabre Laboratories
VS
Alkem Laboratories Ltd.Alkem Laboratories Ltd.
Pierre Fabre Laboratories

Pierre Fabre Laboratories

3, Avenue Hubert Curien, Toulouse, 31100, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.pierre-fabre.com
754/1000Fair

Laboratoires Pierre Fabre held by the Pierre Fabre Foundation, is a worldwide company with a unique positioning : the alliance of pharmaceutical and dermocosmetics expertise. This makes Pierre Fabre Group : 💊 A pharmaceutical group with a strong positioning : medical ...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:9,512
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Alkem Laboratories Ltd.

Alkem Laboratories Ltd.

Lower Parel, Alkem House , Mumbai, IN, 400013

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alkemlabs.com
775/1000Fair

A single idea, which sprouts from a human mind, contains the potential to create marvels that can influence generations. It can redefine rules, it can transform the world. Back in the year 1973, a team of individuals came with such an idea – The idea called Alkem. It wa...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:15,609
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pierre Fabre Laboratories

Pierre Fabre Laboratories

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alkem Laboratories Ltd.

Alkem Laboratories Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pierre Fabre Laboratories in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alkem Laboratories Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pierre Fabre Laboratories (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pierre Fabre Laboratories cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alkem Laboratories Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alkem Laboratories Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pierre Fabre Laboratories

Pierre Fabre Laboratories

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PIE231771222
Alkem Laboratories Ltd.

Alkem Laboratories Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories company and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories company and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories company and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories company and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories company and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories company and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories company and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories company and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories company and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories company and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories company and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories and Alkem Laboratories Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories and Alkem Laboratories Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pierre Fabre Laboratories or Alkem Laboratories Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pierre Fabre Laboratories or Alkem Laboratories Ltd. ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories and Alkem Laboratories Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pierre Fabre Laboratories and Alkem Laboratories Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8