Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pierce College DistrictPierce College District
VS
KaplanKaplan
Pierce College District

Pierce College District

9401 Farwest Dr SW, Lakewood, 98498, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.pierce.ctc.edu
707/1000Moderate

Pierce College District is a community college district in Washington state including Pierce College Puyallup, Pierce College Fort Steilacoom in Lakewood, and centers at Joint Base Lewis-McChord. Pierce is one of the largest educational providers in the state, and is na...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:436
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Kaplan

Kaplan

6301 Kaplan University Ave, Fort Lauderdale, 33309, US

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.kaplan.com
611/1000Poor

Kaplan is a global educational services company that provides individuals, universities, and businesses with a diverse array of services, including higher and professional education, test preparation, language training, corporate and leadership training, and student rec...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:11,288
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pierce College District

Pierce College District

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kaplan

Kaplan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pierce College District in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

Kaplan has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Pierce College District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pierce College District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kaplan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kaplan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pierce College District

Pierce College District

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PIE1026080425
Kaplan

Kaplan

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KAP1774290797
🔒 Incident : Breach
KAPGRA1773858919
🔒 Incident : Breach
KAP1774391709

FAQ

Between Pierce College District company and Kaplan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pierce College District company and Kaplan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pierce College District company and Kaplan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pierce College District company and Kaplan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pierce College District company and Kaplan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pierce College District company and Kaplan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pierce College District company and Kaplan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pierce College District company and Kaplan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pierce College District company and Kaplan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pierce College District company and Kaplan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pierce College District company and Kaplan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pierce College District and Kaplan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pierce College District and Kaplan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pierce College District or Kaplan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pierce College District or Kaplan ?
Between Pierce College District and Kaplan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pierce College District and Kaplan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA