Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pidilite Industrial ProductsPidilite Industrial Products
VS
Tata ElectronicsTata Electronics
Pidilite Industrial Products

Pidilite Industrial Products

Mumbai, IN

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

For over 65 years, Pidilite Industrial Products has been a trusted partner across industries and geographies. Operating in 80+ countries, we deliver high-performance adhesives, pigments, chemicals, and solutions that hold products together, boost efficiency, and ensure ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tata Electronics

Tata Electronics

Bengaluru , IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
800/1000Good

Tata Electronics is a prominent global player in the electronics manufacturing industry, with fast-emerging capabilities in Electronics Manufacturing Services, Semiconductor Assembly and Test, Semiconductor Foundry, and Design Services. Established in 2020 as a greenf...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:16,251
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pidilite Industrial Products

Pidilite Industrial Products

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Electronics

Tata Electronics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pidilite Industrial Products in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Tata Electronics has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Pidilite Industrial Products (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pidilite Industrial Products cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pidilite Industrial Products

Pidilite Industrial Products

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tata Electronics

Tata Electronics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
APP1782203449

FAQ

Between Pidilite Industrial Products company and Tata Electronics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products company and Tata Electronics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products company and Tata Electronics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products company and Tata Electronics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products company and Tata Electronics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products company and Tata Electronics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products and Tata Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products and Tata Electronics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pidilite Industrial Products or Tata Electronics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pidilite Industrial Products or Tata Electronics ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products and Tata Electronics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pidilite Industrial Products and Tata Electronics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8