Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PickupPickup
VS
Penske Truck LeasingPenske Truck Leasing
Pickup

Pickup

68, Rue des Rosiers, Saint-Ouen, 93400, FR

Last Update: 14/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pickup.fr
753/1000Fair

Filiale du groupe La Poste via sa filiale Geopost, Pickup est l'opérateur du réseau de relais et consignes leader en France, avec ses 17 000 relais et 5 000 consignes. Les relais Pickup sont livrés quotidiennement par les transporteurs Colissimo, Chronopost et DPD Franc...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:452
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Penske Truck Leasing

Penske Truck Leasing

2675 Morgantown Rd, Reading, 19607, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

Penske Truck Leasing is a Penske Transportation Solutions company headquartered in Reading, Pennsylvania. A leading provider of innovative transportation solutions, Penske operates and maintains nearly 400,000 vehicles and serves its customers from approximately 1,000 m...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:11,558
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pickup

Pickup

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Penske Truck Leasing

Penske Truck Leasing

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pickup in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Penske Truck Leasing in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pickup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pickup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Penske Truck Leasing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Penske Truck Leasing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pickup

Pickup

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Penske Truck Leasing

Penske Truck Leasing

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pickup company and Penske Truck Leasing company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pickup company and Penske Truck Leasing company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pickup company and Penske Truck Leasing company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pickup company and Penske Truck Leasing company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pickup company and Penske Truck Leasing company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pickup company and Penske Truck Leasing company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pickup company and Penske Truck Leasing company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pickup company and Penske Truck Leasing company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pickup company and Penske Truck Leasing company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pickup company and Penske Truck Leasing company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pickup company and Penske Truck Leasing company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pickup and Penske Truck Leasing, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pickup and Penske Truck Leasing, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pickup or Penske Truck Leasing ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pickup or Penske Truck Leasing ?
Between Pickup and Penske Truck Leasing, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pickup and Penske Truck Leasing, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2