Comparison Overview
Pibank España

Pibank España
Calle Velázquez, 49, Madrid, Madrid, 28001, ES
Last Update: 20/02/2026
Pibank es un banco español que nace bajo el lema "Mejor más fácil" cuyo compromiso es trabajar para ofrecerte productos sencillos, que estén entre los mejores del mercado y simplificar los procesos para hacerte la vida más fácil. Nuestros principios son: transparencia,...

OCBC
65 Chulia St, Singapore, Singapore, SG, 049513
Last Update: 02/04/2026
OCBC is the longest established Singapore bank, formed in 1932 from the merger of three local banks, the oldest of which was founded in 1912. It is now the second largest financial services group in Southeast Asia by assets and one of the world’s most highly-rated banks...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Pibank España







OCBC






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Pibank España in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for OCBC in 2026.
Incident History - Pibank España (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pibank España cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - OCBC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
OCBC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Pibank España

OCBC
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.