Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Physio-Control, now part of StrykerPhysio-Control, now part of Stryker
VS
Baxter International Inc.Baxter International Inc.
Physio-Control, now part of Stryker

Physio-Control, now part of Stryker

11811 Willows Road NE, Redmond, 98052, US

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

Physio-Control, now part of Stryker, is the world leader in the development, manufacture, sale and service of external defibrillator/monitors and emergency medical response products and services. We envision a world in which no person dies suddenly as a result of an ...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:514
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Baxter International Inc.

Baxter International Inc.

1 Baxter Pkwy, Deerfield, 60015, US

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.baxter.com
643/1000Poor

For nearly a century, we have delivered on our commitment to saving and sustaining the lives of patients, working alongside clinicians and providers around the world. We believe every person — regardless of who they are or where they are from — deserves a chance to live...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:39,258
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Physio-Control, now part of Stryker

Physio-Control, now part of Stryker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Baxter International Inc.

Baxter International Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Physio-Control, now part of Stryker in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Baxter International Inc. has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Physio-Control, now part of Stryker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Physio-Control, now part of Stryker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Baxter International Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baxter International Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Physio-Control, now part of Stryker

Physio-Control, now part of Stryker

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Baxter International Inc.

Baxter International Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HIMBAX1787764358
🔒 Incident : Breach
BAX326072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
BAX012072925

FAQ

Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker company and Baxter International Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker company and Baxter International Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker company and Baxter International Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker company and Baxter International Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker company and Baxter International Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker company and Baxter International Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker company and Baxter International Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker company and Baxter International Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker company and Baxter International Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker company and Baxter International Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker company and Baxter International Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker and Baxter International Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker and Baxter International Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Physio-Control, now part of Stryker or Baxter International Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Physio-Control, now part of Stryker or Baxter International Inc. ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker and Baxter International Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Physio-Control, now part of Stryker and Baxter International Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8