Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbHPHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH
VS
HGSHGS
PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH

PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH

Zionskirchstraße 73a, Berlin, 10119, DE

Last Update: 29/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://proficloud.io
752/1000Fair

𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐨𝐓 - 𝐒𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐫𝐮𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐮𝐝.𝐢𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦. Our scalable, standardised cloud services are easy to run - tailored to the industrial requireme...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:40
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HGS

HGS

HGS USA Corporate Headquarters , Chicago, IL , US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://hgs.cx/
748/1000Moderate

A global leader in optimizing the customer experience lifecycle, digital transformation, and business process management, HGS is helping its clients become more competitive every day. HGS combines automation, analytics, and artificial intelligence with deep domain exper...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:28,465
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH

PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HGS

HGS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HGS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HGS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HGS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH

PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HGS

HGS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH company and HGS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH company and HGS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH company and HGS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH company and HGS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH company and HGS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH company and HGS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH company and HGS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH company and HGS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH company and HGS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH company and HGS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH company and HGS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH and HGS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH and HGS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH or HGS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH or HGS ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH and HGS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PHOENIX CONTACT Smart Business GmbH and HGS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1