Phoenix-contact-anz vs Honeywell - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand

Honeywell Technologies

Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand

Unit 7, 2-8 South Street, Rydalmere, 2116, AU

Last Update: 21/01/2026

View Profile

Between 700 and 749

http://www.phoenixcontact.com.au

744/1000Moderate

Phoenix Contact is a globally present, Germany-based market leader. Our group is synonymous with future-oriented components, systems, and solutions in the fields of electrical engineering, electronics, and automation. Follow: http://phoe.co/linkedin

NAICS:33325

NAICS Definition:Others

Employees:41

Subsidiaries:41

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Honeywell Technologies

Honeywell International Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28202

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.honeywell.com

783/1000Fair

Honeywell Technologies is a global, pure-play automation company with a legacy of innovating to help solve the world’s most mission-critical challenges, enhancing the quality of life for people and communities around the world. We serve the building, industrial, and pro...

NAICS:33325

NAICS Definition:Others

Employees:128,847

Subsidiaries:8

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Honeywell Technologies

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Honeywell Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Honeywell Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Honeywell Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Honeywell Technologies

Incidents

🔒 Incident : Vulnerability

HON859080425

🔒 Incident : Vulnerability

HON848072625

🔒 Incident : Breach

FLEHON1766476588

FAQ

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand company and Honeywell Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand and Honeywell Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand and Honeywell Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand or Honeywell Technologies ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand or Honeywell Technologies ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand and Honeywell Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Phoenix Contact Australia + New Zealand and Honeywell Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94057

SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-19

UPDATED

Date2026-09-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.0

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

2.2

REFERENCES

https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20260918.121220.0f87338e.en.html

CVE-2026-94056

SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-19

UPDATED

Date2026-09-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

4.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.2

REFERENCES

https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20260918.121220.0f87338e.en.html

CVE-2026-94055

SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-19

UPDATED

Date2026-09-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

2.2

REFERENCES

https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20260918.121220.0f87338e.en.html

CVE-2026-94054

SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-19

UPDATED

Date2026-09-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.0

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

4.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.2

REFERENCES

https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20260918.121220.0f87338e.en.html

CVE-2026-93993

SUMMARY

Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-19

UPDATED

Date2026-09-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 8.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

5.9

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES