Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PHOENIX BelgiumPHOENIX Belgium
VS
Community Health SystemsCommunity Health Systems
PHOENIX Belgium

PHOENIX Belgium

Avenue Pasteur 2, Wavre, 1300, BE

Last Update: 26/04/2026

View Profile
759/1000Fair

The PHOENIX group is the European leader in pharmaceutical wholesale, pharmacy retail, and services for the pharmaceutical industry. Belgium has a population of 11.3 million people and around 4900 pharmacies in total. With about 2,300 inhabitants per pharmacy the count...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:29
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Community Health Systems

Community Health Systems

4000 Meridian Boulevard, Franklin, 37067, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.chs.net/
671/1000Weak

Community Health Systems is one of the nation’s leading healthcare providers. Developing and operating healthcare delivery systems across 14 states, CHS is committed to helping people get well and live healthier. CHS affiliates operate 70 acute-care hospitals and more t...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:24,576
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PHOENIX Belgium

PHOENIX Belgium

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Community Health Systems

Community Health Systems

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PHOENIX Belgium in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Community Health Systems in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PHOENIX Belgium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PHOENIX Belgium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Community Health Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Community Health Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PHOENIX Belgium

PHOENIX Belgium

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Community Health Systems

Community Health Systems

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
COM201281023
🔒 Incident : Breach
COM21810723
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
COM405072925

FAQ

Between PHOENIX Belgium company and Community Health Systems company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium company and Community Health Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium company and Community Health Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium company and Community Health Systems company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium company and Community Health Systems company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium company and Community Health Systems company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium company and Community Health Systems company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium company and Community Health Systems company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium company and Community Health Systems company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium company and Community Health Systems company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium company and Community Health Systems company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium and Community Health Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium and Community Health Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PHOENIX Belgium or Community Health Systems ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PHOENIX Belgium or Community Health Systems ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium and Community Health Systems, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PHOENIX Belgium and Community Health Systems, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2