Comparison Overview
Philips lighting

Philips lighting
High Tech Campus 45, Eindhoven, 5656, NL
Last Update: 03/12/2025
Philips products deliver business value and transform life in homes, buildings and public spaces. Public Spaces - Create efficient, livable cities. Build a smarter city with connected lighting that can reduce energy and maintenance costs, stimulate economic developme...

Signify
High Tech Campus 48, Eindhoven, North Brabant, NL, 5656 AE
Last Update: 05/04/2026
Signify (Euronext: LIGHT Signify is the world leader in lighting for professionals and consumers. We unlock the extraordinary potential of light for brighter lives and a better world. Our global portfolio of brands deliver advanced products, connected systems and servic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Philips lighting







Signify






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Philips lighting in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Signify in 2026.
Incident History - Philips lighting (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Philips lighting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Signify (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Signify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Philips lighting

Signify
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.