Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Philips Sleep & Respiratory CarePhilips Sleep & Respiratory Care
VS
Brigham and Women's HospitalBrigham and Women's Hospital
Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care

Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care

Amstelplein 2, Amsterdam, 1096 BC, NL

Last Update: 02/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.respironics.com/
765/1000Fair

At Philips, we are committed to what matters most: safe and effective solutions that advance sleep and respiratory care. Our House Rules: https://www.philips.com/a-w/social-media.html

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Brigham and Women's Hospital

US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
786/1000Fair

Boston's Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) is an international leader in virtually every area of medicine and has been the site of pioneering breakthroughs that have improved lives around the world. A major teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School, BWH has a legacy ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:15,364
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care

Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Brigham and Women's Hospital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brigham and Women's Hospital in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Brigham and Women's Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brigham and Women's Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care

Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care company and Brigham and Women's Hospital company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care company and Brigham and Women's Hospital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care company and Brigham and Women's Hospital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care company and Brigham and Women's Hospital company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care company and Brigham and Women's Hospital company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care company and Brigham and Women's Hospital company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care company and Brigham and Women's Hospital company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care company and Brigham and Women's Hospital company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care company and Brigham and Women's Hospital company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care company and Brigham and Women's Hospital company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care company and Brigham and Women's Hospital company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care and Brigham and Women's Hospital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care and Brigham and Women's Hospital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care or Brigham and Women's Hospital ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care or Brigham and Women's Hospital ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care and Brigham and Women's Hospital, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Philips Sleep & Respiratory Care and Brigham and Women's Hospital, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1